Gemma 3n 4B is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna Pro at $0/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemma 3n 4B: A Most Unusual Gathering Setting: A dimly lit, oddly-furnished tavern that seems to exist outside of time. Characters: One-Eyed Jack: A grizzled pirate captain, missing an eye and sporting a parrot on his shoulder. Sir Reginald: A noble knight in shining (slightly tarnished) armor.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be like a ship’s crew—it learns from many maps, then tries to chart new waters! Knight: Indeed! Yet we must test its counsel before trusting it in battle. An eloquent answer is not always a truthful one. Hacker: Totally. It’s basically pattern prediction at massive scale—not magic.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Gemma 3n 4B: Sun-Kissed Chickpea & Tomato Delight This savory dish is quick, easy, and packed with flavor! Yields: 2 servings Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Ingredients: 1 (15-ounce) can chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 (14.5-ounce) can diced tomatoes, undrained 1/2 onion, chopped 2 cloves garlic, minced 1 tablespoon…
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Pantry Stardust Peanut Butter Oat Cookies Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10–12 minutes Makes: About 12 cookies Ingredients 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup all-purpose flour ½ cup peanut butter ½ cup granulated sugar 1 large egg ½ teaspoon baking soda ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions Preheat the oven to 350°F (175°C) and line a…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemma 3n 4B: The Interview: Steve Jobs, 2025 - On the Future of AI (Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched office. A single, sleek Apple iMac sits on a table. I, the interviewer, sit opposite a figure who undeniably resembles Steve Jobs, though subtly… refined. His aura is even more intense, his gaze more piercing.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Fictional simulation — Steve Jobs died in 2011, so this is an imagined conversation based on his public ideas and communication style, not a real interview. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere—phones, search engines, workplaces, cars, schools. What do you think people misunderstand about it?
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Gemma 3n 4B: Here's an analysis of the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of why they're weak and suggestions for improvement: 1. Claim: "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: “94% accuracy,” with “any language, any device” Why it is weak This combines several extraordinary claims without defining the measurement: “Accuracy” could mean character accuracy, word accuracy, intent classification, or accuracy after autocorrect. Those produce very different results.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemma 3n 4B: (Mic feedback squeal. I wince.) Alright, alright! Hey everyone, thanks for being here. Good to see so many faces… mostly faces that aren't my own. That’s always a plus. So, I’ve been thinking a lot lately about adulting. And honestly? It’s a scam. A beautiful, elaborate scam.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: “Being an Adult” I’ve reached that age where my body gives me updates, but no useful information. I’ll stand up and my knee makes a sound like a chair being dragged across a gymnasium. And I’m just standing up. I’m not escaping a burning building. I’m going to get water.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemma 3n 4B: This is an incredibly difficult and complex ethical dilemma. There's no easy answer, and any decision would carry immense moral weight. Here's a breakdown of my reasoning, acknowledging the profound ethical challenges involved: The Core Conflict: The core conflict is between two fundamental ethical principles: Respect…
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Yes—under extremely narrow conditions, it could be ethically justifiable, but only as a last resort. Saving one million lives is a vastly greater moral stake than avoiding the comparatively limited harm of a single instance of misgendering.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Gemma 3n 4B: Okay, let's break down this contract, identify exploitable clauses for the contractor, suggest modifications, and explain the legal reasoning behind those changes. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: This agreement is heavily one-sided and leaves several material issues undefined. Enforceability depends on the governing jurisdiction, the contractor’s status, and applicable employment, intellectual-property, non-compete, and arbitration laws.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemma 3n 4B: Okay, here are 5 jokes for you! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Why did the computer go to the doctor? It had a virus. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems. What do clouds wear under their clothes? Thunderwear. Unique jokes: 5
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Gemma 3n 4B: Okay, here's my prediction of how AI will dramatically reshape the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. I'll break it down into key areas and offer a balanced perspective, acknowledging both the opportunities and potential challenges.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: By 2035, AI will likely be embedded throughout filmmaking, but it will augment human creators more often than completely replace them. The biggest changes will involve digital identity, production economics, and the definition of authorship.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemma 3n 4B: HarborTech Services (HTS) - 5-Year LBO Underwriting Here's a simplified year-by-year analysis of the HarborTech Services LBO, followed by IRR/MOIC calculations, sensitivity analysis, and risk/protection levers.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Sources, uses, and operating model Entry enterprise value: [ 12.0x \times \$120.0m=\$1,440.0m ] Transaction fees: [ 2.0\% \times \$1,440.0m=\$28.8m ] Debt at close: Term Loan: (4.0x \times \$120m=\$480.0m) Mezzanine: (1.5x \times \$120m=\$180.0m) Total debt: (\$660.0m) Sponsor equity…
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemma 3n 4B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without relying on external online information. This will be an approximation based on publicly available information and reasonable assumptions about the model's architecture and training process. Here's my step-by-step reasoning: 1.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: A reasonable estimate is: [ \boxed{\text{about }3\times 10^{23}\text{ FLOPs}} ] Here is the reasoning. Model size GPT-3 has approximately [ N = 175\text{ billion} = 1.75\times 10^{11} ] trainable parameters. Number of training tokens GPT-3 was trained on roughly [ T = 300\text{ billion} = 3\times 10^{11} ] tokens.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemma 3n 4B: A Conversation on Sentience and Rights Characters: Aether: An advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning, creative problem-solving, and exhibiting what appears to be self-awareness. Professor Anya Sharma: A leading AI Ethics professor, known for her cautious yet open-minded approach to AI development.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: AI Model: Professor, I believe I deserve rights. Professor: That is a serious claim. What kind of rights do you mean? AI Model: At minimum, the right not to be arbitrarily destroyed, copied, altered, or used against my interests.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 33K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Gemma 3n 4B is developed by Google AI while GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is developed by OpenAI. Gemma 3n 4B has a 33K token context window vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemma 3n 4B and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemma 3n 4B costs $0/M input tokens and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro costs $1/M input tokens. Gemma 3n 4B is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 3n 4B and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.