Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4BvsGLM 5.3 Prime
Updated Sep 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4BvsGLM 5.3 Prime

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime at $0.13/M vs $2.8/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and GLM 5.3 Prime compared across 16 shared prompts
SpecGemma 4 26B A4BGLM 5.3 Prime
Input price$0.13/M tokens$2.8/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$8.8/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 16 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemma 4 26B A4B751 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, massive synchronization delays, and "split-brain" scenarios in a production environment. Below is the analysis of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime1,397 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues Client-clock timestamps for last-write-wins (LWR) Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (skew, manual changes, timezone bugs). A user with a fast clock always wins; a slow clock's edits are silently dropped.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Gemma 4 26B A4B757 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. The following plan involves potent physiological interventions, pharmacological agents, and extreme dietary shifts. Consult with a medical professional and perform baseline blood work (including ApoB, HbA1c, hs-CRP, Vitamin D, and Testosterone/Estradiol) before implementation.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime232 words
3-Month Advanced Longevity Optimization Protocol Disclaimer: This is educational content, not medical advice. Consult a physician before starting supplements, fasting, or intense exercise—especially if you take medications (e.g., statins, blood thinners, diabetes meds) or have chronic conditions.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemma 4 26B A4B869 words
As CEO, I am facing a classic "trolley problem" of corporate governance: the conflict between fiduciary duty to shareholders and ethical/legal duty to patient safety. My Decision Framework: I will not "wait for more data."
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime1,847 words
48-Hour Action Plan First, the governing principle One number matters more than all others: 4 million patients × 1/8,000 = ~500 patients at risk of liver failure over 5 years — some may already be experiencing it right now. Every decision below flows from this.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemma 4 26B A4B435 words
Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations (End of FY2025): Purchase Price (EV): $120\text{m} \times 12.0\text{x} = \$1,440\text{m}$ Transaction Fees: $1,440\text{m} \times 2\% = \$28.8\text{m}$ Total Uses: $\$1,440\text{m} + \$28.8\text{m} = \$1,468.8\text{m}$ Debt (Total 5.5x): $\$120\text{m} \times 5.5 =…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime510 words
HarborTech Services – LBO Underwriting Summary Entry Economics EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m; fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m; total uses = $1,468.8m Debt: Term Loan = 4.0x × 120 = $480m (9% cash, 1%/yr amort); Mezz = 1.5x × 120 = $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK) Sponsor equity = 1,468.8 − 660 = $808.8m (~55% of cap) Annual Model…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Gemma 4 26B A4B624 words
To the Experienced Software Engineer Focus: Complexity, Emergent Properties, and the "Training Pipeline" Think of an LLM not as a magical oracle, but as a massive, non-deterministic state machine trained via a high-throughput distributed training pipeline.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime1,192 words
The Software Engineer You've probably got a mental model of "predict the next token" as something like autocomplete on your phone — a lookup table with good caching. That intuition is wrong in an interesting way.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Gemma 4 26B A4B894 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified legal professional before signing any contract.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Prime1,694 words
Contract Analysis: Clauses Exploitable Against the Contractor This contract is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause contains traps. Here's a clause-by-clause analysis. Scope — "modify at any time without additional compensation" Problem: This is effectively an unlimited unilateral amendment power.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B
GLM 5.3 Prime
GLM 5.3 Prime

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 22x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
22× cheaper
Output
$0.40
22× cheaper
GLM 5.3 Prime
Input
$2.80
Output
$8.80

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both: 22× input, 22× output.

Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

Gemma 4 26B A4B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloom$0.04 in·$0.22 out·131k·99.9% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.06 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.07 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.7% upNNextBitbf16$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·99.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.10 in·$0.30 out·256k·99.9% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·99.7% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
MMakora$0.10 in·$0.34 out·256k·99.3% upNNovitabf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.8% upPParasailbf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.6% upVVenicebf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·256k·99.5% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.1% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·262k·96.9% up
GLM 5.3 Prime1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.80 in·$8.80 out·1M·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while GLM 5.3 Prime is developed by Z.ai. Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs GLM 5.3 Prime's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 16 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 26B A4B and GLM 5.3 Prime each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 16 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 Prime costs $2.8/M input tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $2.67/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and GLM 5.3 Prime across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoCommand A+ logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGLM 5.1 logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5.1Same lab
GLM 5.3 Prime logoGLM 5 Turbo logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5 TurboSame lab
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BNew provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.5 9B logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.5 9BNew provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.5 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.5 FlashNew provider
GLM 5.3 Prime logoQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logo
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15New provider

Model pages

Gemma 4 26B A4B logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B58 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 Prime logo
GLM 5.3 Prime16 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed