Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 4 community votes, google: gemma 4 26b a4b wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 262K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-4o (Omni)?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 4 blind community votes on Rival. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 262K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o (Omni)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). In community voting, In 4 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 4 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 4+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 19× input, 25× output
Pick Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B. In 4 blind votes, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
