Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, context windows of 262K vs 128K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-4o (Omni)?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o (Omni) are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 262K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o (Omni)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni).

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
GPT-4o (Omni)
58%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length18w
0.31Hedging0.72
6.8Bold7.3
3.3Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.03
0.74Headings1.40
0.15Transitions0.26
Based on 27 + 24 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o (Omni)
FAQ