What is the difference between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Qwen. Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B's 41K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3 30B A3B?

It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 30B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 30B A3B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 30B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Apr 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4BvsQwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper than Gemma 4 26B A4B at $0/M vs $0.13/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 30B A3B compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	Gemma 4 26B A4B	Qwen3 30B A3B
Input price	$0.13/M tokens	Free
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	Free
Context window	262K tokens	41K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	Yes (1 provider)	No
Released	Apr 2026	Apr 2025