What is the difference between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Coder is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3 Coder?

It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen3 Coder?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder costs $0.22/M input tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.09/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Apr 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4BvsQwen3 Coder

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder at $0.13/M vs $0.22/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	Gemma 4 26B A4B	Qwen3 Coder
Input price	$0.13/M tokens	$0.22/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.95/M tokens
Context window	262K tokens	—
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	Yes (1 provider)	No
Released	Apr 2026	Jul 2025