Gemma 4 26B A4BvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at $0.13/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.13/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 3.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
1.2× cheaper
Output
$0.40
3.8× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 3.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
39%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
58%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length16w
0.31Hedging0.31
6.8Bold6.0
3.3Lists4.5
0.00Emoji0.58
0.74Headings0.88
0.15Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 MiniNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5 NanoNew provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5 ProNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.1New provider