What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.02/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.02/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Which Is Better?

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 3.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

1.2× cheaper

Output

$0.40

3.8× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Input

$0.15

Output

$1.50

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 3.8× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

39%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

58%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length16w

0.31Hedging0.31

6.8Bold6.0

3.3Lists4.5

0.00Emoji0.58

0.74Headings0.88

0.15Transitions0.10

Based on 27 + 17 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs xAI: Grok 4New provider

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 3.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

1.2× cheaper

Output

$0.40

3.8× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Input

$0.15

Output

$1.50

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 3.8× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

39%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

58%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length16w

0.31Hedging0.31

6.8Bold6.0

3.3Lists4.5

0.00Emoji0.58

0.74Headings0.88

0.15Transitions0.10

Based on 27 + 17 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs xAI: Grok 4New provider