Rival
Sign Up

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 10.0M, tested across 45 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Scout?

Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 262K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Scout

Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 31B
Llama 4 Scout
57%Vocabulary43%
18wSentence Length42w
0.37Hedging0.81
7.1Bold4.1
4.0Lists7.3
0.24Emoji0.00
0.94Headings0.30
0.16Transitions0.04
Based on 23 + 10 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 31BLlama 4 Scout
FAQ
Keep going
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-5 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5New provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 MaverickCross-provider
Google: Gemma 4 31B logoGrok 3 logo
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Grok 3New provider