Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 10.0M, tested across 45 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Scout?
Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 262K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Scout
Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 1.8× input, 1.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji
