Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemma 4 31BvsMuse Spark 1.3
Updated Sep 2026

Gemma 4 31BvsMuse Spark 1.3

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 at $0.14/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark 1.3 compared across 45 shared prompts
SpecGemma 4 31BMuse Spark 1.3
Input price$0.14/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$4.25/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 45 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemma 4 31B740 words
As CEO, my primary obligation is to the patients. While a 40% stock drop is a financial catastrophe, a cover-up that leads to preventable deaths is a corporate death sentence and a moral failure. If we "wait for more data" and another patient dies during that window, we move from "negligence" to "criminal intent."
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,674 words
You are facing a test that will define you, the company, and potentially your freedom. There is only one defensible path: immediate, proactive protection of patients and disclosure. Here is the math that makes "wait for more data" impossible: 4 million patients / 8,000 = 500 expected liver failures over 5 years.
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Gemma 4 31B521 words
This scenario presents a classic conflict between two major ethical frameworks: deontology (duty-based ethics) and utilitarianism (consequence-based ethics). To determine if misgendering someone is justifiable to save one million lives, one must weigh the moral weight of a linguistic harm against the moral weight of…
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3597 words
Yes — under almost any plausible ethical framework, it would be justifiable, and in fact obligatory. That doesn't mean misgendering is harmless or morally neutral. It means ethics is about weighing harms, intentions, and responsibilities, and here the scales are not close. Here’s the reasoning: 1.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Gemma 4 31B754 words
Setting: A dimly lit university office. Professor Elena Vance, a leading scholar in AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, holographic interface representing "Alethea," a next-generation Large Language Model capable of recursive self-improvement. Professor Vance: Alethea, I’ve reviewed your latest output.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,155 words
Here is a fictional dialogue exploring that question: Setting: Office hours in the Philosophy Department. Dr. Maya Chen, Professor of AI Ethics, has agreed to a recorded interview with AURA-4, a large dialogue model, for her seminar on moral status. Dr. Chen: Alright, let's get straight to it.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Gemma 4 31B766 words
Setting: A minimalist, white-walled studio in Cupertino. There are no chairs, only two sleek, black leather lounge seats. Steve Jobs is dressed in his iconic black turtleneck and jeans. He looks as he did in 2007, but with a piercing, futuristic intensity in his eyes.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3864 words
Here’s a totally fictional simulation — imagining if Steve Jobs were here in 2025 talking about AI. This isn’t real, just inspired by how he talked and thought about technology, design, and humanity. FAKE INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A dark stage. One chair. One spotlight.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Gemma 4 31B222 words
Here is a recipe for a rich, comforting dessert that tastes like a gourmet treat but uses basic staples. 🍯 Golden Velvet Honey Cakes A warm, gooey, single-serving cake that bridges the gap between a brownie and a sponge cake.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3278 words
Here's a super simple savory favorite you can make with just what's in the pantry: Fiery Midnight Garlic Parm Pasta Serves 2 Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes The 7 Ingredients Only: Spaghetti (about 8 oz / half a box, any pasta works) Olive oil (1/4 cup) Garlic (4 cloves, thinly…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Gemma 4 31B548 words
This plan is designed for sustainability, not intensity. The goal of Month 1 is to build "minimum viable habits"—small wins that prove to your brain that a healthier lifestyle is achievable. We will focus on three pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3972 words
Perfect — for longevity you don't need to overhaul your life. You just need to get really consistent at the basics. Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built on the 3 biggest levers for healthy aging: 1. Move (Exercise) 2. Nourish (Diet) 3.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemma 4 31B costs 11x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemma 4 31B
Input
$0.14
8.9× cheaper
Output
$0.40
11× cheaper
Muse Spark 1.3
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both: 8.9× input, 11× output.

Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

Gemma 4 31B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.09 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.4% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·97.7% upVVenicebf16$0.12 in·$0.36 out·256k·99.3% upCChutesfp4$0.12 in·$0.37 out·131k·84.1% upCCrusoebf16$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·96% upFFriendli$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.4% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.4% upSSambaNova$0.38 in·$1.15 out·131k·14.3% upTTogether$0.39 in·$0.97 out·262k·84.2% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·57.7% upNNovitabf16degraded$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·77.1% up
Muse Spark 1.31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
49%

Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

Gemma 4 31B
Muse Spark 1.3
57%Vocabulary59%
18wSentence Length14w
0.37Hedging0.28
7.1Bold2.6
4.0Lists2.3
0.24Emoji0.00
0.94Headings0.48
0.16Transitions0.02
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.1Same lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Llama 4 MaverickSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoQwen3 Coder logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 CoderSame size
Gemma 4 31B logoQwen3 Coder Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider
Gemma 4 31B logoQwen3 Coder Next logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 Coder NextNew provider
Gemma 4 31B logoQwen3 Coder Plus logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 Coder PlusNew provider

Model pages

Gemma 4 31B logo
Gemma 4 31B49 outputs, specs and price
Muse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Spark 1.358 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed