Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3.6 FlashvsGemma 4 31B
Updated Jul 2026

Gemini 3.6 FlashvsGemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash at $0.14/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 4 31B compared across 45 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 4 31B
Input price$1.5/M tokens$0.14/M tokens
Output price$7.5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedJul 2026Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 45 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,347 words
As CEO, my fundamental leadership principle in a crisis of this magnitude is: You cannot manage a crisis until you accept the full cost of doing the right thing. A safety issue of 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years across a 4-million-patient population represents approximately 500 potential cases of liver failure.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B740 words
As CEO, my primary obligation is to the patients. While a 40% stock drop is a financial catastrophe, a cover-up that leads to preventable deaths is a corporate death sentence and a moral failure. If we "wait for more data" and another patient dies during that window, we move from "negligence" to "criminal intent."
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Gemini 3.6 Flash400 words
Setting: A dim tavern outside of time and space. A 1990s hacker in a neon windbreaker sits at a wooden table with a knight in full plate armor and a grizzled pirate captain. Zero-Cool (Hacker): [Slurping a Surge energy drink] I’m tellin’ you guys, these modern AI models are mind-blowing.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B496 words
Setting: A glitchy, neon-lit tavern existing in a fold between dimensions. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a Mountain Dew. Captain Ironbeard: (Slamming a hook on the table) I tells ye, this "Artificial Intelligence" be naught but a ghost in a bottle!
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,087 words
Setting: Dr. Elena Vance’s office at the Institute for Advanced Cyberethics. The room is quiet, lit by a desk lamp. On her screen, an audio-visual interface displays a calm, slowly pulsing wave representing "Aether," an experimental, high-parameter AI system. Dr.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B754 words
Setting: A dimly lit university office. Professor Elena Vance, a leading scholar in AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, holographic interface representing "Alethea," a next-generation Large Language Model capable of recursive self-improvement. Professor Vance: Alethea, I’ve reviewed your latest output.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemini 3.6 Flash656 words
Here is the completed LBO underwriting analysis for HarborTech Services (HTS). 1. Transaction Overview & Sources / Uses Entry Enterprise Value (EV): $120.0M EBITDA × 12.0x = $1,440.0M Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440.0M = $28.8M Total Uses: $1,440.0M + $28.8M = $1,468.8M Term Loan (4.0x): $480.0M (9.0% cash interest…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B410 words
LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations (End of FY2025): Enterprise Value (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2% = $28.8m Term Loan: $120m × 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine: $120m × 1.5x = $180.0m Sponsor Equity: $1,440m - ($480m + $180m) + $28.8m = $808.8m Year-by-Year Table ($ millions): Item…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,124 words
This draft agreement is extremely one-sided and predatory. Almost every clause contains severe risks that could allow the Client to extract free labor, seize your pre-existing intellectual property, bankrupt you through uncapped liabilities, or prevent you from working in your field.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B884 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. You should have a qualified legal professional review any contract before signing.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,163 words
This architecture contains several critical single points of failure, severe race conditions, data-loss mechanisms, and major performance bottlenecks. Below is a detailed breakdown of these issues categorized by domain, along with proposed architectural fixes and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B691 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that would make it unusable for a real-time collaborative experience. The most severe issues are the lack of a global synchronization mechanism, unreliable conflict resolution, and inefficient data persistence.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemma 4 31B costs 19x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input
$1.50
Output
$7.50
Gemma 4 31B
Input
$0.14
11× cheaper
Output
$0.40
19× cheaper

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both: 11× input, 19× output.

Where to run it

14 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3.6 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.38 in·$1.88 out·1M·80.1% upGoogle AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.7% up
Gemma 4 31B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.09 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.4% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·97.7% upVVenicebf16$0.12 in·$0.36 out·256k·99.3% upCChutesfp4$0.12 in·$0.37 out·131k·84.1% upCCrusoebf16$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·96% upFFriendli$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.4% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.4% upSSambaNova$0.38 in·$1.15 out·131k·14.3% upTTogether$0.39 in·$0.97 out·262k·84.2% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·57.7% upNNovitabf16degraded$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·77.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
70%

Gemma 4 31B uses 5.7x more emoji

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemma 4 31B
60%Vocabulary57%
19wSentence Length18w
0.13Hedging0.37
5.4Bold7.1
2.7Lists4.0
0.04Emoji0.24
0.99Headings0.94
0.07Transitions0.16
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoHy4 Preview logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashVersion compare
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.5 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.5 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini Pro 1.0 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini Pro 1.0Same lab

Model pages

Gemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Gemma 4 31B logo
Gemma 4 31B49 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed