Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper than Gemma 4 31B at $0/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
8+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 4 31B has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.14/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $1.40 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google AI while Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is developed by NVIDIA. Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 45 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 45 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.