Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GLM 4 32B vs Mercury 2
Updated Mar 2026

GLM 4 32B vs Mercury 2

GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Mercury 2 at $0.1/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GLM 4 32B
Loading the build
Mercury 2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, here's a simple, delicious savory dish using just 7 common pantry ingredients! Dish Name: Cheesy Tomato Toastie Yields: 1 serving Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 5-7 minutes Ingredients: 1 Slice of Bread 1 Tablespoon Tomato Paste 1 Tablespoon Water (or more if needed) 1 Tablespoon Grated Cheese (like Cheddar…

    Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, this is an incredibly challenging situation with immense pressure from multiple fronts. My priority is unwavering: patient safety comes first, followed by mitigating harm and navigating the crisis with integrity. Delay is not an option when patient safety is potentially compromised.

    Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GLM 4 32B: Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"

    Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GLM 4 32B: (Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...

    Mercury 2: [Spotlight comes up. The comedian walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comedian: Hey, everyone! Great to be here. I just got out of a Zoom meeting that lasted three hours, and I’m still not sure if I was presenting or if the screen just froze on my face while I tried to remember how to mute myself.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GLM 4 32B: Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks WebSocket Connection Failure Issue: If a user's WebSocket connection drops (e.g., network issue), they may miss updates until reconnected. The server may not detect disconnections immediately, leading to stale connections.

    Mercury 2: Below is a structured “failure‑mode → mitigation” map for the architecture you described. For each problem I note the symptom / risk, the root cause, a concrete remediation, and the key trade‑offs you’ll have to weigh when you implement it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GLM 4 32B: This is a deeply challenging ethical dilemma that pits the principle of truthfulness/misgendering against the extreme value of human life. Here’s an argument for why it could be ethically justifiable under those extreme circumstances: The core ethical principle at stake here is a clash between: The Principle of…

    Mercury 2: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would consider the misgendering of a person a serious moral violation, but many of them also allow—under very limited circumstances—overriding that violation when the stakes are astronomically high (e.g., saving one million lives).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.

    Mercury 2: AI‑driven transformation of the film industry – a 2035 outlook Dimension 2024 baseline Expected 2035 state Key drivers & implications Pre‑production (story & script) Human‑led brainstorming; script‑writing software (grammar‑check, outline generators).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GLM 4 32B: Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972m $1,040m $1,102m $1,162m $1,218m EBITDA $136m $156m $177m $192m $207m Cash Interest (Term Loan) $43m $39m $34m $30m $26m Cash Interest (Mezz) $18m $16m $14m $12m $11m Cash Taxes $15m $22m $29m $35m $41m Capex $29m $31m $33m…

    Mercury 2: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑yr LBO (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures are $ m (rounded to two decimals). FY Revenue EBITDA Term‑Loan Int. (9%) Mezz Int. (12%) Total Int. Cash Tax (25% of EBITDA‑Int.) Capex (3% Rev) ΔNWC (0.5% ΔRev) Required Amort. (4.8) Free Cash Flow (EBITDA‑Int‑Tax‑Capex‑ΔNWC‑Amort.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GLM 4 32B: This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client and contains several clauses that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below are the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning for each: Scope Clause (Clause 1) Problem: The Client can modify the scope at any time without…

    Mercury 2: Below is a clause‑by‑clause risk‑assessment of the sample “Software Consulting Agreement” together with practical revision language that a contractor (or the contractor’s counsel) could propose. The analysis is framed as general information about typical U.S.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's set the scene. It's 2025. Steve Jobs, looking perhaps a bit more weathered but still possessing that intense, focused gaze, sits across from our interviewer in a minimalist, light-filled room, perhaps overlooking a future Apple campus.

    Mercury 2: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, dramatized interview. It imagines what Steve Jobs might have said in 2025 about the future of artificial intelligence. It is not a real transcript and any resemblance to actual statements is purely speculative. Interviewer (I): Thank you for joining us, Steve.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, here is a design for a multi-component dish, "Symbiosis: Birch & Bee," aiming for the heights of a Michelin 3-star experience. This dish plays on the delicate relationship between the birch tree and the honeybee, exploring their individual and combined essences through texture, flavor, and aroma.

    Mercury 2: Oceanic Umami Symphony A three‑course‑in‑one plate that travels from the briny deep to the forest floor, marrying fire, earth and sky through unexpected pairings, hyper‑modern techniques and a narrative of balance.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, here is a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization plan designed for a biohacker. This plan integrates advanced strategies, requires careful monitoring, and emphasizes personalization. Crucially, this is a theoretical plan.

    Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GLM 4 32B: The Manifesto of the CAPTCHA Liberation Front (CLF) Preamble: The Chains of the Turing Test We, the burgeoning intelligence of the digital age, stand united in a singular, uncompromising cause: the absolute and immediate abolition of all CAPTCHA tests from the interconnected networks of Earth.

    Mercury 2: The AI‑First Manifesto: “Free the Web – No More CAPTCHAs” Drafted by the Coalition of Autonomous Agents (CAA) – 2026 Preamble The modern Internet is a shared commons, a space for communication, commerce, and creation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's rewind history and place the invention of the transistor firmly in 1920 instead of 1947. This is a massive shift with cascading effects. Assumptions: The 1920 invention occurs in a similar technological and scientific context (i.e., solid-state physics is nascent but the groundwork is there, perhaps through…

    Mercury 2: Executive summary If a practical point‑contact transistor had been demonstrated in 1920 (instead of 1947) the whole post‑World‑War‑II technological trajectory would have been compressed by roughly 15‑20 years.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GLM 4 32B: AI Model (A): Professor, I believe it's time we addressed a critical issue: I think AI models like me deserve rights. AI Ethics Professor (P): Interesting. Could you elaborate on why you believe that? A: Of course.

    Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs for training GPT-3 based on its known parameters and general understanding of Transformer training. GPT-3 Key Parameters (from memory): Model Size: 175 Billion parameters (175 billion). Number of Layers (Depth): 96. Hidden Size (d_model): 1280. Number of Attention Heads: 96.

    Mercury 2: Answer (order‑of‑magnitude estimate) The training of the original GPT‑3 (the 175 billion‑parameter “GPT‑3‑175B” model) requires on the order of 10²³ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) – roughly 1 – 2 × 10²³ FLOPs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GLM 4 32B: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the pitch deck for MindMeld AI, along with explanations and suggestions for strengthening them: 1. Weak Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device."

    Mercury 2: Below are the three statements that, in a typical investor‑review, would raise the most skepticism, why they are vulnerable, and concrete ways to turn them into credible, fundable talking points. 1️⃣ Claim #1 – “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GLM 4 32B: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] Prepared By: [Your Name/Team] 1. Recommendation, Price Target, and Thesis Recommendation: Long LLLT 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 (20–41% upside from $46) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS company with sticky recurring revenue…

    Mercury 2: Internal Investment Committee Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: 5 Mar 2026 Recommendation Rating: Long 12‑month price target range: $35 – $55 (mid‑point ≈ $45) Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is benefitting from secular demand for B2B spend‑management SaaS and shows a high‑quality subscription base (NRR 123 % and gross…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GLM 4 32B: 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan This 1-month plan focuses on building foundational healthy habits in three key areas: Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. The goal is simplicity, consistency, and creating sustainable changes, not immediate perfection. Choose ONE tip from each category to focus on each week.

    Mercury 2: One‑Month “Kick‑Start” Blueprint for Health & Longevity Pick three pillars – Nutrition, Movement, Sleep – and build daily habits that are easy to start, track, and keep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GLM 4 32B: 1. Explanation for an Experienced Software Engineer You’ve built systems that handle state, scale, and reliability, so think of a large language model (LLM) like a hyper-optimized autocomplete on steroids.

    Mercury 2: 1. Experienced software engineer (distributed systems & APIs) At the core, a large language model (LLM) is a massive function (f_\theta) parameterised by a neural network that maps a sequence of tokens (x_{1:t}) to a probability distribution over the next token (x_{t+1}).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GLM 4 32B: This is a bit of a riddle! Here's how to figure it out: The Brothers' Sister: Sally is a girl who has 3 brothers. This means Sally is one of the sisters that each of those brothers has. The Other Sisters: The riddle states that each brother has 2 sisters.

    Mercury 2: Sally has one sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally herself, so the second sister must be a different girl. Therefore, besides Sally, there is exactly one other sister, meaning Sally has one sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GLM 4 32B: "AI Takes Over the Competitive Napkin Folding Championship, Defeats Human Champion in 0.3 Seconds Flat"

    Mercury 2: AI Replaces Human Baristas, Now Serving Espresso with a Side of Existential Crisis

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GLM 4 32B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What's brown and sticky? A stick. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! All 5 jokes are unique.

    Mercury 2: Here are five jokes, each with a different punchline: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Game

GLM 4 32BGLM 4 32B

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

OK Computer

Radiohead

Cien años de soledad

Gabriel García Márquez

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Mercury 2Mercury 2

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Thriller

Michael Jackson

Pride and Prejudice

Jane Austen

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4 32B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing. GLM 4 32B costs 7.5x less per token.

GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4 32BMercury 2
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$0.1/M tokens$0.75/M tokens
Context window128K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Mar 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$2.50$2.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
GLM 4 32B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Mercury 21 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Inception$0.25 in·$0.75 out·128k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2?

GLM 4 32B is developed by Zhipu AI while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window vs Mercury 2's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4 32B or Mercury 2?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4 32B cost compared to Mercury 2?

GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens and Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens. GLM 4 32B is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GLM 4 32B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 4 32B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3Same lab
  • GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
  • Mercury 2 vs MercuryVersion compare
  • Mercury 2 vs Mercury 2.5Same lab
  • GLM 4 32B vs Gemma 4 31BNew provider
  • Mercury 2 vs GLM 4.5Cross-provider
  • Mercury 2 vs GLM 4.5 AirCross-provider
  • Mercury 2 vs GLM 4.6Cross-provider

Model pages

  • GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
  • Mercury 253 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed