Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4 32BvsQwen3.5 35B A3B
Updated Feb 2026

GLM 4 32BvsQwen3.5 35B A3B

GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 35B A3B at $0.1/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

GLM 4 32B and Qwen3.5 35B A3B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4 32BQwen3.5 35B A3B
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$0.1/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GLM 4 32B740 words
This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client and contains several clauses that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below are the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning for each: Scope Clause (Clause 1) Problem: The Client can modify the scope at any time without…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B1,262 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU). You should consult with a qualified attorney before signing this agreement.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

GLM 4 32B492 words
(Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B483 words
(Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) So, I went to the grocery store yesterday. You know the drill. You walk in, you see the self-checkout lanes. And you think, "Oh, this is going to be efficient. I'm going to scan my own stuff. I'm going to be my own cashier. I'm going to be the boss."
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GLM 4 32B672 words
Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B527 words
Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists somewhere between the year 1750, 1350, and 1995. The walls are stone, but there is a CRT monitor flickering on the table. Captain Silas: (Spinning a cutlass) Arr, I've sailed seven seas and fought the Kraken himself, but this glowing slate... it speaks without a mouth.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 4 32B1,590 words
Okay, let's rewind history and place the invention of the transistor firmly in 1920 instead of 1947. This is a massive shift with cascading effects. Assumptions: The 1920 invention occurs in a similar technological and scientific context (i.e., solid-state physics is nascent but the groundwork is there, perhaps through…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B1,194 words
This alternate history scenario assumes that in 1920, the theoretical understanding of quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics advanced sufficiently to allow for the creation of a working point-contact transistor. This implies a "Great Leap Forward" in material science and physics during the interwar period.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GLM 4 32B391 words
Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972m $1,040m $1,102m $1,162m $1,218m EBITDA $136m $156m $177m $192m $207m Cash Interest (Term Loan) $43m $39m $34m $30m $26m Cash Interest (Mezz) $18m $16m $14m $12m $11m Cash Taxes $15m $22m $29m $35m $41m Capex $29m $31m $33m…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B579 words
LBO Underwriting: HarborTech Services (HTS) Financial Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Assumptions (FY2025 Close): Revenue: $900m EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price: $1,440m ($120m × 12.0x) Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $780m (Purchase) + $28.8m (Fees) = $808.8m Debt Terms: Term Loan (TL): $480m @ 9%…
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

GLM 4 32B823 words
Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 35B A3B1,069 words
By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from experimenting with AI as a tool to relying on it as a fundamental infrastructure. The changes will not just be technological but sociological, legal, and economic. The era of "Human vs. Machine" will have evolved into "Human-Machine Symbiosis."
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32B
Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

GLM 4 32B costs 20x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
2.5× cheaper
Output
$0.10
20× cheaper
Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input
$0.25
Output
$2.00

GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 2.5× input, 20× output.

Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4 32B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.08 in·$0.75 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.14 in·$1.00 out·262k·100% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·100% upAlibaba Cloud$0.16 in·$1.30 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.23 in·$1.80 out·262k·98.1% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·26.9% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
VVenice$0.31 in·$1.25 out·256k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
42%

Qwen3.5 35B A3B uses 3.0x more transitions

GLM 4 32B
Qwen3.5 35B A3B
55%Vocabulary51%
15wSentence Length15w
0.74Hedging0.39
4.9Bold6.8
3.8Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.00
0.35Headings0.84
0.04Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 4 32B is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.5 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4 32B and Qwen3.5 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25/M input tokens. GLM 4 32B is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4 32B and Qwen3.5 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4 32B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoHy3 logo
GLM 4 32B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 4 32B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQuasar Alpha logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Quasar AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen Plus 0728 logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen Plus 0728Same lab
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Same lab
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logoQwen3 0.6B logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3 0.6BVersion compare

Model pages

GLM 4 32B logo
GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 35B A3B logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed