GLM 4 32BvsQwen3.5 397B A17B
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.1/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4 32B | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.1/M tokens | $3.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GLM 4 32BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
GLM 4 32B costs 36x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
6.0× cheaper
Output
$0.10
36× cheaper
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
Output
$3.60
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 6.0× input, 36× output.
Where to run it
10 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 4 32B
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
39%
Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji
GLM 4 32B
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
55%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length14w
0.74Hedging0.39
4.9Bold6.9
3.8Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.23
0.35Headings0.93
0.04Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
GLM 4 32B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GLM 4 32B vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-5New provider
GLM 4 32B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
GLM 4 32B vs Claude 3 SonnetNew provider
GLM 4 32B vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)New provider
GLM 4 32B vs Claude 3.7 SonnetNew provider
GLM 4 32B vs Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetNew provider