Z.AI: GLM 4.5 vs xAI: Grok 4
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 by Zhipu AI against xAI: Grok 4 by xAI, in 28 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 wins 64% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 256K, tested across 34 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 or xAI: Grok 4?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is the better choice overall, winning 64% of 28 blind community votes on Rival. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $3/M for xAI: Grok 4. Context windows: 128K vs 256K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and xAI: Grok 4
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is made by zhipu while xAI: Grok 4 is from xai. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to xAI: Grok 4's 256K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $3/M for xAI: Grok 4. In community voting, In 28 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 64% of head-to-head duels.
In 28 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 64% of head-to-head duels. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 leads in Web Design, while xAI: Grok 4 leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 28+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5. In 28 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 for Web Design. Pick xAI: Grok 4 for Reasoning. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is 6.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 uses 4.6x more transitions
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.





