Z.AI: GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 by Zhipu AI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, in 8 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 wins 57% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is the better choice overall, winning 57% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 128K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is made by zhipu while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 57% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 57% of head-to-head duels. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has the edge overall. In 8 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 wins 57% of the time.
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 4.4x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
