What is the difference between GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B?

GLM 4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI while QwQ 32B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window vs QwQ 32B's 40K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.5 or QwQ 32B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.5 cost compared to QwQ 32B?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and QwQ 32B costs $0.5/M input tokens. QwQ 32B is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B?

GLM 4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI while QwQ 32B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window vs QwQ 32B's 40K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.5 or QwQ 32B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.5 cost compared to QwQ 32B?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and QwQ 32B costs $0.5/M input tokens. QwQ 32B is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jul 2025

GLM 4.5vsQwQ 32B

QwQ 32B is cheaper than GLM 4.5 at $0.5/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B compared across 15 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.5	QwQ 32B
Input price	$0.6/M tokens	$0.5/M tokens
Output price	$2.2/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	40K tokens
Released	Jul 2025	Mar 2025
LiveCodeBench	63.3%	63.4%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.5

QwQ 32BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5

Input

$0.60

Output

$2.20

QwQ 32B

Input

$0.50

1.2× cheaper

Output

$1.50

1.5× cheaper

QwQ 32B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 1.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

62%

GLM 4.5 uses 13.1x more emoji

GLM 4.5

QwQ 32B

52%Vocabulary64%

14wSentence Length12w

0.49Hedging0.36

5.5Bold13.6

4.9Lists8.4

0.13Emoji0.00

0.68Headings0.00

0.20Transitions0.39

Based on 21 + 4 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Grok 4New provider

GLM 4.5 vs InklingNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs INTELLECT-3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Kimi K2New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905New provider

Updated Jul 2025

GLM 4.5vsQwQ 32B

QwQ 32B is cheaper than GLM 4.5 at $0.5/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B compared across 15 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.5	QwQ 32B
Input price	$0.6/M tokens	$0.5/M tokens
Output price	$2.2/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	40K tokens
Released	Jul 2025	Mar 2025
LiveCodeBench	63.3%	63.4%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.5

QwQ 32BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.5 and QwQ 32B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5

Input

$0.60

Output

$2.20

QwQ 32B

Input

$0.50

1.2× cheaper

Output

$1.50

1.5× cheaper

QwQ 32B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 1.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

62%

GLM 4.5 uses 13.1x more emoji

GLM 4.5

QwQ 32B

52%Vocabulary64%

14wSentence Length12w

0.49Hedging0.36

5.5Bold13.6

4.9Lists8.4

0.13Emoji0.00

0.68Headings0.00

0.20Transitions0.39

Based on 21 + 4 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Grok 4New provider

GLM 4.5 vs InklingNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs INTELLECT-3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Kimi K2New provider

GLM 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905New provider