Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.6vsLaguna S 2.1 (free)
Updated Jul 2026

GLM 4.6vsLaguna S 2.1 (free)

Laguna S 2.1 (free) is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

GLM 4.6 and Laguna S 2.1 (free) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.6Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Input price$0.4/M tokensFree
Output price$1.75/M tokensFree
Context window203K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GLM 4.6735 words
Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. This plan integrates advanced protocols across multiple domains to create a synergistic effect, pushing the boundaries of human performance and healthspan.
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)1,140 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation & Assessment (Month 1) Week 1-2: Baseline Establishment Comprehensive Health Testing Complete blood panel (CBC, CMP, lipid panel, inflammatory markers: hs-CRP, IL-6) Hormone panel (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol, thyroid panel) Genetic…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GLM 4.61,669 words
Of course. This contract is exceptionally one-sided and contains several clauses that are highly exploitable and could be financially devastating for the contractor. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the problems, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)275 words
I'll analyze each clause for potential exploitation against the contractor and suggest improvements. Exploitable Clauses & Recommended Modifications SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" Allows unlimited scope creep without extra pay No…
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GLM 4.61,116 words
TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Analyst Team] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: Long Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Mispriced Quality in Spend Management 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-Month Price Target (PT) Range: $90 - $160 per share.
Read the full answer
Laguna S 2.1 (free)910 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 – $75/share Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, exceptional unit economics, and durable customer retention.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 4.6
GLM 4.6
Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Laguna S 2.1 (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.6
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.75
Laguna S 2.1 (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
VVenicefp4$0.43 in·$1.75 out·198k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.00 out·203k·99.6% upNNovitabf16$0.55 in·$2.20 out·205k·98.8% upZ.aifp4$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·99.7% up
Laguna S 2.1 (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
PPoolsidefp4$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI while Laguna S 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and Laguna S 2.1 (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Laguna S 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Laguna S 2.1 (free) is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and Laguna S 2.1 (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4.6 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoHy3 logo
GLM 4.6 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 4.6 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoLaguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)Same lab
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
GLM 4.6 logoLaguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
GLM 4.6 vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)Cross-provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs LFM2.5-2.6BNew provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoLing 2.6 1T logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logoLing 2.6 Flash logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free) vs Ling 2.6 FlashSame size

Model pages

GLM 4.6 logo
GLM 4.659 outputs, specs and price
Laguna S 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna S 2.1 (free)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed