What is the difference between GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick?

GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI while Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta AI. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs Llama 4 Maverick's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.6 or Llama 4 Maverick?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.6 cost compared to Llama 4 Maverick?

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens. GLM 4.6 is $1.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Sep 2025

GLM 4.6vsLlama 4 Maverick

GLM 4.6 is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick at $0.4/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.6	Llama 4 Maverick
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Output price	$1.75/M tokens	$2.5/M tokens
Context window	203K tokens	1.0M tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Sep 2025	Apr 2025
LiveCodeBench	82.8%	43.4%