Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.6 by Zhipu AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 203K vs 1.0M, tested across 25 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.6 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Z.AI: GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 203K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick

Z.AI: GLM 4.6 is made by zhipu while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Z.AI: GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Our Verdict
Z.AI: GLM 4.6
Z.AI: GLM 4.6
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Z.AI: GLM 4.6Llama 4 Maverick
FAQ