Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.6 by Zhipu AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 203K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.6 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Z.AI: GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 203K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick
Z.AI: GLM 4.6 is made by zhipu while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Z.AI: GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4.6 is cheaper on both — 3.8× input, 1.4× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
Z.AI: GLM 4.6 uses 17.9x more emoji
