Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.6vsNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Updated Sep 2025

GLM 4.6vsNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.04/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

GLM 4.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compared across 55 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.6NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.04/M tokens
Output price$1.75/M tokens$0.16/M tokens
Context window203K tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2025
LiveCodeBench82.8%71.1%
Our Verdict
GLM 4.6
GLM 4.6
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs 11x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.6
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.75
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Input
$0.04
10× cheaper
Output
$0.16
11× cheaper

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper on both: 10× input, 11× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.65 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
VVenicefp4$0.43 in·$1.75 out·198k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.00 out·203k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·92.4% upNNovitabf16degraded$0.55 in·$2.20 out·205k·95.1% upZ.aifp4degraded$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·72.1% up
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 uses 4.5x more emoji

GLM 4.6
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
52%Vocabulary54%
16wSentence Length15w
0.31Hedging1.02
5.1Bold6.0
3.2Lists4.6
0.14Emoji0.63
0.54Headings0.63
0.08Transitions0.20
Based on 28 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoOx Alpha logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoGPT OSS 120B logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoMiniMax M3 logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.6 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
GLM 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoQwen3.7 Max logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.7 MaxNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoQwen3.7 Plus logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.7 PlusNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logoQwen3.8 27B logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.8 27BNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed