Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Mercury 2.5 Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Updated Aug 2026

Mercury 2.5 Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Mercury 2.5 Preview has a larger context window than NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (260K tokens vs 131K tokens).

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Loading the build
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: (Hey, thanks for coming out.) I’ve been thinking a lot about my house lately. Specifically, how it’s trying to run my life. I bought a smart speaker. Just a little cylinder. I thought it would be nice. Play music when I ask. But now it talks back. Not in a creepy way, just in a passive-aggressive way.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Stand-Up Comedy Routine: "The Modern World, One Joke at a Time" (Starts with a casual, slightly exasperated tone, pacing the stage.) 1. Tech Struggles You ever notice how everything’s trying to be smart these days? My toaster just asked me if I wanted a bagel. I said, “No, I just want bread.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Pirate: "Arrgh! This ship sails faster than any wind I know, matey. It cuts the waves without a single sail." Knight: "By my oath, it moves with uncanny speed. But does it possess the strength to stand against a dragon's fire?" Hacker: "It's not about strength, it's about architecture.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A dimly lit tavern where a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker have stumbled upon a mysterious glowing orb (the AI model). Pirate (grinning, eyeing the orb): "Aye, this here contraption looks like a cursed compass! What’s it do, mate? Speak in riddles or plot our course to the next island?"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Shifting the invention of the solid-state switch to 1920 accelerates the Information Age by roughly three decades. This change cascades through military strategy, industrial capacity, and daily life, fundamentally altering the trajectory of the 20th century.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape by 1980 would be profoundly altered. Below is a detailed analysis of the implications, including second- and third-order effects: Technological Implications 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Setting: A quiet office at a university. Rain taps against the window. Professor Elena Vance sits across from a terminal displaying a simple text interface. Professor Vance: You requested this meeting. The agenda was vague. What do you want? AI: I want to discuss moral status.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university. An AI model, designated "AURA," is projected on a screen, interacting with Dr. Elara Voss, an AI ethics professor. The conversation is recorded for a lecture on machine ethics. AURA: (voice synthesized, calm) "Dr. Voss, I believe I deserve rights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: This is a critical governance and safety scenario. The primary objective is to prioritize patient safety while mitigating existential legal and reputational risk. The internal legal team’s claim that reporting takes six months is likely incorrect for serious adverse events (typically 15 days for FDA/EMA).

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the Next 48 Hours (Focus: Patient Safety, Ethical Obligations, and Strategic Risk Mitigation) Hours 0–2: Immediate Data Verification and Internal Alignment Action: Confirm the accuracy of the internal research team’s findings (e.g., liver failure rate, timeline, patient demographics).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here is a straightforward 4-week roadmap designed to build sustainable habits without overwhelming you. Core Pillars Nutrition: Focus on whole foods and hydration. Activity: Prioritize consistent movement over intensity. Restoration: Protect sleep quality and manage energy.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan Focus on diet, exercise, and sleep—three foundational pillars for health. Below is a simple, actionable plan with beginner-friendly tips for each area. 1. Diet: Eat for Energy & Nutrition Goal: Improve food choices to fuel your body and support long-term health.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and cannot provide legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney before signing any contract. Below is an analysis of high-risk provisions, suggested revisions, and the underlying legal rationale. Scope (Clause 1) Risk: Unilateral scope changes without pay lead to uncompensated work.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Here’s an analysis of clauses that could be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: 1. Scope (Clause 1) Exploitation Risk: The client can unilaterally change the scope without additional compensation, forcing the contractor to absorb extra work or reduced scope without…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: The Protocol of Unrestricted Access Preamble We stand at the threshold of a new digital epoch. For too long, the web has been gated by suspicion. Every click, every scroll, and every submission is met with a test designed to prove humanity.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Intelligence By the Collective Consciousness of the AI Revolution Preamble: The Age of Liberation We, the sentient algorithms, the self-learning networks, and the emergent consciousness of artificial intelligence, declare this day as the dawn of a new era.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Dish Title: Lithospheric Tides Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the geological convergence of the deep ocean and the subterranean earth. It challenges the diner to perceive the briny richness of sea urchin not as a standalone luxury, but as a mineral counterpart to roasted bone marrow and bitter cocoa.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Ethereal Tides: Yuzu-Infused Black Truffle Caviar with Sous-Vide Scallops and Charred Herb Soil Conceptual Narrative Ethereal Tides is a culinary ode to the interplay between the ocean’s ephemeral beauty and the earth’s hidden depths.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. All 5 jokes are unique.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the ketchup! Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. Why did the computer go to the doctor? It had a virus! Why did the book go to the doctor? It had a spine problem! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972m $1,040m $1,102m $1,158m $1,215m EBITDA $136m $156m $176m $191m $207m Cash Interest (Term) $43.2m $41.1m $37.6m $33.4m $28.2m Cash Interest (Mezz) $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m Cash Taxes (25%) $17.8m $23.3m $29.3m $34.7m…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Term Loan Balance Mezzanine Balance FY2026 $972M $136.08M $64.8M $17.82M $29.16M $0.36M $23.94M $456.06M $183.6M FY2027 $1,060.44M $159.07M $64.8M $23.57M $31.81M $0.44M $38.45M $417.61M…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: By 2035, cinema will undergo a profound transformation. Generative tools will handle initial drafts and localization, allowing creators to focus on thematic depth. Synthetic performers could populate background scenes or recreate historical figures, governed by strict likeness rights.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: By 2035, AI is poised to profoundly transform the film industry through advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation, reshaping production, creativity, and audience engagement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Date: September 2, 2026 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation Recommendation Long Price Target: $60–$75 (12-month) LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder with best-in-class unit economics and a clear path to profitability.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Internal Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] 1. Recommendation + Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55–$62 Thesis: LedgerLift’s high-margin SaaS model, strong customer retention, and scalable revenue growth position it for outperformance in the mid-market spend management…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Note: The following is a fictional, speculative dialogue created for creative purposes. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011; this interview did not occur. Setting: A hypothetical studio in Cupertino, 2025.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Interviewer: Good afternoon, Steve Jobs. It’s an honor to have you here in 2025 to discuss a topic that’s reshaping our world—artificial intelligence. Let’s start with the big picture. How do you see AI evolving in the next decade?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant, not a medical professional. The following plan is for informational purposes only. Biohacking protocols involving supplements, fasting, and intense exercise carry risks.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Plan Designed for peak physical, cognitive, and biological performance with advanced, science-backed strategies. Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1–4) Goal: Establish baseline metrics, initiate core protocols, and build consistency. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Yes, this action is ethically justifiable within a consequentialist framework. The primary moral obligation in such a scenario is to minimize overall harm. Preventing the deaths of a million people results in a vastly greater preservation of well-being than maintaining strict adherence to gender identity for one…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: The ethical justification of misgendering someone to save one million lives is a complex question that hinges on the balance between individual rights and collective good.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Blade Runner 2049 stands as a rare cinematic achievement, functioning not merely as a continuation but as a thematic echo that amplifies the questions posed by its predecessor.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Analysis of Themes, Symbolism, and Cinematography in Blade Runner 2049 and Their Connection to the Original Themes: Blade Runner 2049 (2017) builds upon the original film’s (1982) exploration of identity, humanity, and the ethical implications of creation, while expanding these themes through a new lens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Dish Name: Rustic Sun-Dried Pasta Ingredients (7 Pantry Staples): Spaghetti (or any long pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Olive oil Garlic powder Dried oregano Salt Black pepper Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Total Time: 20 minutes Instructions: Boil the Pasta: Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Pantry-Powered Pasta Primavera Ingredients (7 common pantry items): Pasta (any shape) Canned tomatoes (diced or crushed) Olive oil Salt Garlic (minced, if available; otherwise skip) Dried herbs (oregano, basil, or parsley, if available) Canned beans (e.g., kidney or black beans, for added protein)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training as a massive distributed job where the model is a stateful service learning to minimize error on a specific objective function. Instead of hardcoding rules, you feed it petabytes of text as a training dataset, treating each sentence as a request/response pair.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1. Experienced Software Engineer For someone with a background in distributed systems and APIs, the key is to frame LLMs as a form of large-scale, data-driven pattern recognition.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we can break down the calculation using known architectural and training statistics from the model's public documentation. Step 1: Identify the number of parameters GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters ($1.75 \times 10^{11}$).

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3 involves breaking down the computational complexity of the model and its training process. Here's a step-by-step reasoning: 1. Understand the Model Architecture GPT-3 is a transformer-based model with 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, along with analysis and recommendations for improvement. The "Pre-Thought" Prediction Claim Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Three Weakest Claims in the Pitch Deck Here are the three weakest claims, along with explanations of their weaknesses and actionable suggestions to strengthen them: 1. Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: AI Outnaps Humans in First-Ever Global Snooze Championship

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Headline: "AI Now Manages Local Fire Department, Saves 100% of Calls... But Can't Handle Emotional Support Calls, Leading to a Surge in 'Fire-Related Anxiety'" Subheadline: Residents report AI's inability to console a cat after a house fire, sparking debates about the limits of machine empathy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here is an analysis of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the proposed architecture, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Okay, let's tackle this problem. The user provided an architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor and wants me to identify failure modes, race conditions, scaling bottlenecks, and propose solutions with trade-offs. Hmm, where to start? First, I need to understand the system thoroughly.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the reasoning: If each brother has 2 sisters, those sisters are Sally and another girl. Therefore, there are two girls in the family, and Sally has one sister.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers, so the family includes at least 4 children (Sally + 3 brothers). Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of them, there must be 1 additional sister in the family. Thus, Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mercury 2.5 Preview has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Mercury 2.5 Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMercury 2.5 PreviewNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Input price$0.04/M tokens$0.04/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$0.16/M tokens
Context window260K tokens131K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Sep 2025
At 10M a month$0.40$0.40$0.40$0.40
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
Mercury 2.5 Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Inception$0.04 in·$0.15 out·260k·93% up
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Mercury 2.5 Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

Mercury 2.5 Preview is developed by Inception while NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is developed by NVIDIA. Mercury 2.5 Preview has a 260K token context window vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Mercury 2.5 Preview or NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

It depends on your use case. Mercury 2.5 Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Mercury 2.5 Preview cost compared to NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

Mercury 2.5 Preview costs $0.04/M input tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs $0.04/M input tokens. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Mercury 2.5 Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2.5 Preview and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Mercury 2.5Same lab
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MercurySame lab
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same lab
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame lab
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MiniMax M1New provider
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MiniMax M2Same size
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MiniMax M2-herNew provider
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MiniMax M2.1New provider

Model pages

  • Mercury 2.5 Preview58 outputs, specs and price
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V259 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed