GLM 4.6vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.15/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4.6 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.75/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
GLM 4.6
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4.6
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.75
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
2.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
1.2× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 1.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 3.2x more emoji
GLM 4.6
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
52%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length16w
0.29Hedging0.31
5.2Bold6.0
3.2Lists4.5
0.18Emoji0.58
0.57Headings0.88
0.09Transitions0.10
Based on 22 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 4.5 AirCross-provider
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 4.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 4.7 FlashCross-provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5Cross-provider