What is the difference between GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.6 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.6 cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.6 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.6 cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

GLM 4.6vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a larger context window than GLM 4.6 (262K tokens vs 203K tokens).

GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.6	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$1.75/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	203K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Sep 2025	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	68.0%	72.0%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.6

Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.6

Input

$0.40

Output

$1.75

1.8× cheaper

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

Output

$3.20

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

63%

Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 2.3x more transitions

GLM 4.6

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

52%Vocabulary49%

14wSentence Length15w

0.29Hedging0.29

5.2Bold6.2

3.2Lists4.8

0.18Emoji0.10

0.57Headings0.88

0.09Transitions0.20

Based on 22 + 24 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.6 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1New provider

GLM 4.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)New provider

GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNew provider

Updated Feb 2026

GLM 4.6vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a larger context window than GLM 4.6 (262K tokens vs 203K tokens).

GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.6	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$1.75/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	203K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Sep 2025	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	68.0%	72.0%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.6

Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.6

Input

$0.40

Output

$1.75

1.8× cheaper

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

Output

$3.20

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

63%

Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 2.3x more transitions

GLM 4.6

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

52%Vocabulary49%

14wSentence Length15w

0.29Hedging0.29

5.2Bold6.2

3.2Lists4.8

0.18Emoji0.10

0.57Headings0.88

0.09Transitions0.20

Based on 22 + 24 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.6 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1New provider

GLM 4.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)New provider

GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider

GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNew provider