What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Llama 3.1 405B is developed by Meta AI. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Llama 3.1 405B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Llama 3.1 405B?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $2.63/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jan 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsLlama 3.1 405B

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $0.07/M vs $2.7/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B compared across 12 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Llama 3.1 405B
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$2.7/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$3.1/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	128K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jan 2026	Jul 2024