What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. in 5 community votes on Rival, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Based on 5 community votes on Rival, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups against GLM 4.7 Flash. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is strongest in Reasoning.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.00/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 67% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 5 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. in 5 community votes on Rival, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Based on 5 community votes on Rival, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups against GLM 4.7 Flash. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is strongest in Reasoning.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.00/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 67% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 5 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Which Is Better?

Updated Jan 2026

Our Verdict

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Winner

GLM 4.7 FlashRunner-up

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In 5 blind votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Reasoning.

Clear winner

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

Output

$0.40

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

Output

$0.28

1.4× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash·Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

51%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

52%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.33Hedging0.12

5.8Bold7.5

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.68

0.68Headings0.93

0.13Transitions0.12

Based on 19 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Updated Jan 2026

Our Verdict

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Winner

GLM 4.7 FlashRunner-up

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In 5 blind votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Reasoning.

Clear winner

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

Output

$0.40

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

Output

$0.28

1.4× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash·Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

51%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

52%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.33Hedging0.12

5.8Bold7.5

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.68

0.68Headings0.93

0.13Transitions0.12

Based on 19 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider