What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.6 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.09/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Apr 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsQwen3.6 35B A3B

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B at $0.07/M vs $0.1612/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.6 35B A3B compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$0.1612/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.9653/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	262K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jan 2026	Apr 2026