Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4

Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 by Z-ai against Claude Sonnet 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 203K vs 200K, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Claude Sonnet 4 are both competitive models. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4. Context windows: 203K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Claude Sonnet 4

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is made by z-ai while Claude Sonnet 4 is from anthropic. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 200K. On pricing, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4.

Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is 3.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Claude Sonnet 4 uses 87.9x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Claude Sonnet 4
54%Vocabulary62%
18wSentence Length111w
0.31Hedging0.40
3.6Bold5.0
2.6Lists9.3
0.00Emoji0.88
0.43Headings2.16
0.11Transitions0.33
Based on 27 + 17 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Z.ai: GLM 5.1Claude Sonnet 4

Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.

178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.

Model Similarity Index

185x

price gap between models that write identically

178

models

12

clone pairs

32

dimensions

Devstral M / S
95.7%
Qwen3 Coder / Flash
95.6%
GPT-5.4 / Mini
93.3%

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions