Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 by Z-ai against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, tested across 35 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 5176x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
9333× cheaper
Output
$0.001
5176× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 9333× input, 5176× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
33%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji
Z.ai: GLM 5.1
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
54%Vocabulary57%
18wSentence Length18w
0.31Hedging0.40
3.6Bold5.9
2.6Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.45
0.43Headings1.07
0.11Transitions0.11
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
