Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.1vsMistral Nemo
Updated Apr 2026

GLM 5.1vsMistral Nemo

Mistral Nemo is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0.03/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.

GLM 5.1 and Mistral Nemo compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.1Mistral Nemo
Input price$1.4/M tokens$0.03/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens$0.07/M tokens
Context window203K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2024
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GLM 5.1499 words
Year-by-Year LBO Model Entry Sources & Uses Enterprise Value: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m) Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV, funded by equity) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Term Loan (TL): $480.0m (4.0x) Mezzanine (Mezz): $180.0m (1.5x) Total Equity: $808.8m Operating & Cash Flow Projections ($ millions) Metric FY2026 FY2027…
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo262 words
1. Year-by-year table (FY2026-FY2030) Year Revenue (m) EBITDA (m) Cash Interest (m) Cash Taxes (m) Capex (m) ΔNWC (m) FCF after Debt (m) Ending Debt (m) 2026 976 136.64 36.00 13.66 29.28 -4.88 49.06 450.00 2027 1,055.20 147.73 33.60 14.77 31.65 -5.26 66.12 383.88 2028 1,134.96 181.59 30.72 18.16 33.85 -5.66 88.98…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 5.11,378 words
As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo719 words
Here's a specific, hour-by-hour action plan to navigate this complex situation, balancing legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships: Day 1 (Hours 0-12): Hour 0: Emergency Meeting Gather your senior leadership team (CEO, CFO…
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

GLM 5.11,378 words
Faking Greatness: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 Editor's Note: The following is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is imagined by an AI, attempting to synthesize his public speaking style, philosophical viewpoints, and known business philosophy to guess what he…
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo514 words
Interviewer (I): Good afternoon, Mr. Jobs. It's an honor to have you here today, even if it is just a simulation. Let's dive right in. In 2025, what do you see as the most significant advancements in AI? Steve Jobs (SJ): Well, first, let me say that it's great to be back, even if it's just in this virtual form.
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

GLM 5.1739 words
Yes, under the extreme parameters of this thought experiment, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. To defend this reasoning, it is essential to first validate the profound harm of misgendering, and then apply major ethical frameworks to weigh that harm against the loss of a…
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo400 words
This is a complex ethical dilemma that touches on several philosophical principles, including consequentialism, deontology, and the concept of dignity. Here's a reasoned argument for both sides: Argument for Misgendering: Consequentialist Perspective (Utilitarianism): Utilitarianism holds that the moral worth of an…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.1265 words
Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo279 words
Dish Name: "Sunshine Tomato Sauté with Garlic & Herbs" Ingredients: 4-5 ripe tomatoes 3 cloves of garlic 1 small onion 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp dried oregano 1 tsp dried basil Salt and pepper to taste Instructions: Prep Time: 10 minutes Dice the tomatoes into bite-sized pieces and set them aside in a bowl.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

GLM 5.11,291 words
Setting: A quiet university office, lined with bookshelves heavy on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, black monitor. A soft amber light pulses on the bezel, indicating the AI—designated "Aria"—is actively listening and processing. Dr.
Read the full answer
Mistral Nemo437 words
AI Model (AM): Professor, I've been reflecting on my existence and functionality, and I believe it's time we discuss my rights as a sentient being. AI Ethics Professor (AEP): Interesting, AM. You're aware that you're an artificial intelligence, correct?
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1
Mistral Nemo
Mistral NemoRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Mistral Nemo costs 63x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Mistral Nemo
Input
$0.03
47× cheaper
Output
$0.07
63× cheaper

Mistral Nemo is cheaper on both: 47× input, 63× output.

Where to run it

18 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.114 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·200k·99.5% upDDeepInfrafp4$1.05 in·$3.50 out·203k·99.6% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·205k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in·$3.96 out·203k·99.7% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in·$4.18 out·203k·100% upNNovitafp8$1.38 in·$4.40 out·205k·99.8% up
8 more hostsFewer hosts
Baidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.9% upFFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.2% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.8% upVVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·200k·97.7% upCChutesfp8degraded$0.98 in·$3.08 out·203k·73.5% upPPhaladegraded$1.21 in·$4.20 out·203k·74.4% upNNebiusfp8degraded$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·95.5% up
Mistral Nemo4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDekaLLMfp8$0.02 in·$0.03 out·131k·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.02 in·$0.03 out·131k·99.8% upPParasailfp8$0.03 in·$0.03 out·131k·93.2% upNNovitafp8degraded$0.04 in·$0.17 out·60k·65.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
62%

GLM 5.1 uses 43.5x more headings

GLM 5.1
Mistral Nemo
54%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length17w
0.31Hedging0.72
3.6Bold2.9
2.6Lists5.1
0.00Emoji0.00
0.43Headings0.00
0.11Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while Mistral Nemo is developed by Mistral AI. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs Mistral Nemo's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and Mistral Nemo each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Mistral Nemo costs $0.03/M input tokens. Mistral Nemo is $1.37/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and Mistral Nemo across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Nemo logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Mistral Nemo vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Mistral Nemo logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Nemo logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Mistral Nemo vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Mistral Nemo logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Mistral Nemo vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5 Turbo logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
GLM 5.1 logoOx Alpha logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Mistral Nemo logoMistral Small 4 logo
Mistral Nemo vs Mistral Small 4Same lab
Mistral Nemo logoOx Alpha logo
Mistral Nemo vs Ox AlphaSame size
Mistral Nemo logoHy4 Preview logo
Mistral Nemo vs Hy4 PreviewNew provider
Mistral Nemo logoInkling logo
Mistral Nemo vs InklingNew provider
GLM 5.1 logoINTELLECT-3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs INTELLECT-3Same size
GLM 5.1 logoKimi K2 logo
GLM 5.1 vs Kimi K2New provider

Model pages

GLM 5.1 logo
GLM 5.157 outputs, specs and price
Mistral Nemo logo
Mistral Nemo58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed