Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.1vsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 5.1vsNex-N2.5-Pro (free)

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.

GLM 5.1 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.1Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input price$1.4/M tokensFree
Output price$4.4/M tokensFree
Context window203K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 5.11,321 words
Dish Title: Resonance of the Littoral Zone Course: Main Course (Fish) Wine Pairing: Aged Hunter Valley Semillon or Coastal Jura Chardonnay Conceptual Narrative The littoral zone is the intersection of land and sea—a violent, beautiful threshold where tides batter ancient stone, and tenacious flora clings to saline…
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1,665 words
Dish: “Tidewater Orchard” Langoustine · Mirabelle Plum · Juniper · Kombu · Rye A tasting-menu course built around an unusual pairing: sweet cold-water langoustine with mirabelle plum, bridged by kombu umami, juniper resin, green tomato acidity, and toasted rye bitterness.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GLM 5.1717 words
This 1-month plan is designed to build a foundation for longevity without overwhelming you. The secret to long-term success is consistency over intensity. Instead of overhauling your life overnight, you will add one small, manageable habit each week across three core pillars: Movement, Nourishment, and Sleep.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)518 words
1-Month Beginner Health & Longevity Plan Goal: Build simple habits you can keep—not perfection. Focus on 3 areas: diet, exercise, and sleep/stress. Diet: Eat for steady energy Week 1: Add before you subtract Add 1 fruit or vegetable to 2 meals per day. Drink a glass of water when you wake up and before meals.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 5.11,378 words
As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,359 words
As CEO, I would not wait six months and I would not let the board delay disclosure while patients remain exposed to an unreported serious risk. I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and trust crisis—not merely a financial-risk issue. My guiding decisions would be: Patient safety comes first.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GLM 5.11,442 words
This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that are either inherently exploitative or give the Client excessive discretionary power to the detriment of the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,451 words
Below is a general contract-risk review, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, contractor classification, and the exact facts. Also, even if a clause might be unenforceable, relying on that is risky because litigation/arbitration is expensive.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 5.11,173 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, race conditions, severe performance bottlenecks, and security vulnerabilities. Below is a detailed breakdown of the issues and proposed solutions.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)3,042 words
Executive summary The biggest correctness risks are: Client-clock last-write-wins is unsafe: clock skew, malicious clients, ties, and out-of-order delivery can silently lose edits.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 5.11,208 words
To envision the invention of the transistor in 1920, we must first resolve a historical anomaly: quantum mechanics—the theoretical foundation of semiconductors—did not yet exist. For this timeline to work, we must assume a serendipitous empirical leap.
Read the full answer
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,726 words
Starting assumption Assume the 1920 “transistor” is a usable but crude solid-state amplifier/switch: reproducible enough for telecom and radio, but noisy, low-power, temperature-sensitive, and expensive at first.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

15 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.114 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·200k·99.5% upDDeepInfrafp4$1.05 in·$3.50 out·203k·99.6% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·205k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in·$3.96 out·203k·99.7% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in·$4.18 out·203k·100% upNNovitafp8$1.38 in·$4.40 out·205k·99.8% up
8 more hostsFewer hosts
Baidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.9% upFFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.2% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.8% upVVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·200k·97.7% upCChutesfp8degraded$0.98 in·$3.08 out·203k·73.5% upPPhaladegraded$1.21 in·$4.20 out·203k·74.4% upNNebiusfp8degraded$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·95.5% up
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIfp8degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is developed by Nex AGI. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is $1.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5 Turbo logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
GLM 5.1 logoOx Alpha logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoNex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoClaude 2 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Claude 2Same size
GLM 5.1 logoClaude 3 Haiku logo
GLM 5.1 vs Claude 3 HaikuNew provider
GLM 5.1 logoClaude 3 Opus logo
GLM 5.1 vs Claude 3 OpusNew provider
GLM 5.1 logoClaude 3 Sonnet logo
GLM 5.1 vs Claude 3 SonnetSame size

Model pages

GLM 5.1 logo
GLM 5.157 outputs, specs and price
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)14 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed