Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.2vsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 5.2vsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is cheaper than GLM 5.2 at $0/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.

GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) compared across 18 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input price$1.4/M tokensFree
Output price$4.4/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)Yes (1 provider)
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 18 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GLM 5.2619 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to ease you into better health and longevity. By focusing on just three foundational pillars—Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep—you can build sustainable habits without feeling overwhelmed. The goal of this plan is consistency over intensity.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)493 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan 🥗 Key Area 1: Diet — Nourish Your Body Week 1: Add one extra serving of vegetables to your day (e.g., a handful of spinach in your morning eggs or a side salad at dinner). Week 2: Swap one sugary drink (soda, juice, sweetened coffee) per day for water or herbal tea.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 5.21,053 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920—a full 27 years before its historical debut at Bell Labs—the 20th century would have been radically transformed. The transition from mechanical and vacuum-tube technology to solid-state electronics would have accelerated the Information Age by nearly three decades.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)2,673 words
If the Transistor Had Been Invented in 1920: A Counterfactual Trajectory to 1980 Preconditions and plausibility By 1920, Karl Braun's cathode ray tube (1897) and Greenleaf Pickard's silicon crystal detector (1906) had already demonstrated semiconductor properties. Quantum theory was nascent (Planck, Bohr).
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.2250 words
Dish Name: Midnight Magic Peanut Noodles Estimated Time: Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Staples): Spaghetti (or any long pasta you have on hand) Creamy peanut butter Soy sauce Rice vinegar Honey Garlic powder Crushed red pepper flakes Instructions: Cook…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)234 words
✨ Midnight Stardust Pasta ✨ A silky, golden garlic butter pasta that tastes far more magical than its humble ingredients suggest. ⏱ Time Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 12 minutes Total: 17 minutes 🛒 Ingredients (7 Pantry Staples) Spaghetti (8 oz) Butter (4 tbsp) Olive oil (2 tbsp) Garlic (4 cloves, minced) Parmesan cheese (½…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 5.2904 words
This architecture has several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, real-time collaborative editor. Here is a breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, scaling bottlenecks, and proposed solutions.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1,856 words
Architecture Audit: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor Critical Issues Found: 25+ REAL-TIME COLLABORATION FAILURES Issue #1 — Last-Write-Wins Silently Destroys User Work Problem: If User A and User B both edit the same paragraph, the change with the later client timestamp wins.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GLM 5.2996 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Sector: Technology / B2B SaaS (Spend Management & AP Automation) Current Price: $46.00 Market Cap: $8.74B Net Cash: $1.4B EV: $7.34B Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG (Tactical) 12-Month PT Range: $50 – $54 Thesis: LedgerLift is a category-leading…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1,203 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO — LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) Classification: Internal — Investment Committee Date: June 2025 Analyst: [Portfolio Team] Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $28–$38 (base-to-bull DCF; downside to $17 in bear) Thesis: LLLT trades at ~$46 (mkt cap ~$8.7B, EV ~$7.3B)…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GLM 5.2661 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with the reasoning for why they fail to hold up to investor scrutiny and concrete ways to fix them. The Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)907 words
3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Deck "Partnership discussions with Apple and Samsung" (Slide 5) Why it's weak: This is a classic credibility vacuum — a claim that's designed to impress but actively damages trust with informed investors.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.2
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

23 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.222 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.56 in·$1.80 out·1M·99% upSStreamLakefp8$0.64 in·$2.02 out·1M·99.6% upNNovitafp8$0.65 in·$2.04 out·1M·100% upDDigitalOcean$0.70 in·$2.20 out·262k·97.9% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.76 in·$2.42 out·1M·99.6% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.94 in·$2.95 out·1M·99.9% up
16 more hostsFewer hosts
Alibaba Cloudfp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·1M·99.9% upIInceptronfp4$1.01 in·$3.24 out·1M·98.7% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.8% upPPhalafp8$1.26 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.6% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·262k·98.9% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upFFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.9% upPParasailfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·262k·99.8% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.5% upVVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.1% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upDDecartfp4$2.25 in·$8.00 out·1M·99.9% up
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitabf16$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI while Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is developed by inclusionAI. GLM 5.2 has a 1.0M token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.2 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is $1.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.2 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.2 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.2 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoAurora Alpha logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Aurora AlphaSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoBert-Nebulon Alpha logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Bert-Nebulon AlphaSame size
GLM 5.2 logoChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logo
GLM 5.2 vs ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoClaude 2 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Claude 2Same size

Model pages

GLM 5.2 logo
GLM 5.258 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)18 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed