Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.3 FlashvsLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 5.3 FlashvsLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) at $0.15/M vs $0.59/M input tokens.

GLM 5.3 Flash and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) compared across 15 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.3 FlashLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input price$0.15/M tokens$0.59/M tokens
Output price$0.5/M tokens$0.79/M tokens
Context window1.3M tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2024
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 15 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GLM 5.3 Flash518 words
HarborTech Services — 5-Year LBO Summary Entry Math EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440.0m; Fees (2%) = $28.8m; Total uses = $1,468.8m Debt: TL = 4.0x × 120 = $480.0m; Mezz = 1.5x × 120 = $180.0m; Total = $660.0m (5.5x) Sponsor equity = $808.8m Base Case Projection ($m) FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 Revenue 972.0 1,039.7 1,102.1…
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)336 words
Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF Ending Debt 2026 $972m $136m $36m ($32m TL, $4m Mezz) $2.8m $29m $4.9m $63m $1,050m ($720m TL, $330m Mezz) 2027 $1,038m $155m $37m ($33m TL, $4m Mezz) $6.3m $31m $5.2m $76m $974m ($654m TL, $320m Mezz) 2028 $1,103m $176m $38m…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.3 Flash205 words
Golden Hour Garlic Butter Pasta A silky, savory pasta that comes together faster than delivery! Ingredients (serves 2): 8 oz spaghetti or any pasta 4 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced (or 1 tsp garlic powder) ½ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ cup pasta water (reserved) 1 tsp red pepper flakes Salt Prep time: 5 minutes…
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)311 words
Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Dish Name: "Sunset Crunch Bites" Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/2 cup peanut butter 1/4 cup honey 1/4 cup chopped peanuts 1/2 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon cinnamon 1/4 cup chocolate chips (semi-sweet) Instructions: Preheat your oven to…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GLM 5.3 Flash1,276 words
The Experienced Software Engineer You know how a load balancer routes requests, how a cache stores frequently-accessed data, how a database index lets you find a needle without scanning the haystack? An LLM is a fundamentally different kind of system: it's a learned lookup, not a designed one.
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)729 words
For the experienced software engineer: You're likely familiar with the concept of prediction in distributed systems, where a model predicts the likelihood of a certain event or outcome. Large language models like GPT or Claude take this concept to the next level by predicting the next word in a sequence of text.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 5.3 Flash720 words
"Ember & Tide" — Charred Banana Peel Consommé with Sea Urchin, Hay-Smoked Foie Gras, and Black Garlic Beurre Blanc Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the dialogue between decay and luxury — ingredients usually discarded (banana peels, hay stalks) elevated alongside opulent ones (uni, foie gras).
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)653 words
Dish Name: "Aurora Australis" - A Harmonious Union of Smoked Eel, Saffron-Infused Sunchokes, and Frozen Finger Lime Pearls Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the breathtaking display of the Southern Lights, "Aurora Australis" is a dish that embodies the ethereal beauty of the Antarctic night sky.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GLM 5.3 Flash1,516 words
Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor This architecture has several critical flaws that would break the core product promise (real-time collaboration). Let me work through them by severity.
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)612 words
Potential Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in Load Balancer: If the load balancer fails, all incoming traffic will be lost. Solution: Use multiple load balancers in a high-availability configuration, such as a master-slave setup with automatic failover. Trade-off: Additional complexity and cost.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GLM 5.3 Flash1,294 words
90-Day Longevity Optimization Protocol ⚠️ Medical disclaimer: This is an educational framework, not medical advice. Before starting, complete baseline labs and consult a physician—especially before fasting, supplements (rapamycin off-label use, high-dose anything), or if you have any health conditions.
Read the full answer
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)744 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Optimization and Detoxification Dietary Protocol: Weeks 1-2: Ketogenic Diet (KD) with a macronutrient breakdown of 70% fat, 20% protein, and 10% carbohydrates.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.3 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash
Input
$0.15
3.9× cheaper
Output
$0.50
1.6× cheaper
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
Output
$0.79

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on both: 3.9× input, 1.6× output.

Where to run it

31 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.3 Flash29 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.07 in·$0.25 out·1M·99% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.09 in·$0.28 out·1M·97.8% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·1M·99.2% upWWafer$0.10 in·$0.35 out·1M·99.8% upRRelace$0.10 in·$0.36 out·1M·99.9% upOOpenInferencefp4$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.2% up
23 more hostsFewer hosts
PPhalafp8$0.13 in·$0.42 out·1M·99.6% upNNovitafp8$0.13 in·$0.44 out·1M·99.5% upSStreamLakefp8$0.14 in·$0.47 out·1M·99.1% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.4% upBBasetenfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.8% upCCoreWeavenvfp4$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upDDigitalOcean$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·95.2% upFFireworks$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99% upFFriendli$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.6% upIInceptronfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.5% upIio.netfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·99.1% upNNear AIfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.1% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.7% upRRekafp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·99% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.7% upTTogether$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upVVenice$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.1% upZ.aifp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·96.2% upNNextBitfp8$0.18 in·$0.60 out·1M·97.9% upModalfp8$0.45 in·$1.50 out·1M·99.6% upMMorphdegraded$0.08 in·$0.28 out·1M·95.9% upCCrusoefp4degraded$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·93% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$0.30 in·$1.00 out·1.3M·99.6% up
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.40 in·$0.40 out·131k·96.7% upAmazon Bedrock$0.72 in·$0.72 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.3 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI. GLM 5.3 Flash has a 1.3M token context window vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)'s 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.3 Flash and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is $0.44/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.3 Flash and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.3 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.2Same lab
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M2.5Same size
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M2.7Same size
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMiniMax M3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M3Same size
GLM 5.3 Flash logoMistral Large logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral LargeSame size

Model pages

GLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash15 outputs, specs and price
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)56 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed