Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.3vsKimi K2 Thinking
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 5.3vsKimi K2 Thinking

Kimi K2 Thinking is cheaper than GLM 5.3 at $0.6/M vs $0.6538/M input tokens.

GLM 5.3 and Kimi K2 Thinking compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.3Kimi K2 Thinking
Input price$0.6538/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Output price$2.0548/M tokens$2.5/M tokens
Context window1.3M tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Nov 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.3210 words
Golden Pantry Fried Rice Total Time: 20 minutes (5 min prep, 15 min cook) Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Cooked white rice (day-old is best) Eggs Soy sauce Garlic (minced or garlic powder) Frozen peas and carrots Canned corn Vegetable oil Instructions Prep (5 min): Break up cold rice with a fork. Drain the corn.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking137 words
Creative Name: Midnight Peanut Noodles Ingredients: 8 oz dried spaghetti or any pasta 1/3 cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 tablespoons vegetable oil 1 tablespoon sugar 1 teaspoon hot sauce (or pinch of red pepper flakes) Instructions: Bring a large pot of salted water to boil.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 5.31,143 words
The Core Decision (Made Before Hour 1) The side effect is real, serious, and known to me now. Patients are currently taking this drug without informed consent about a ~1-in-8,000 liver failure risk. Everything else — stock price, board pressure, legal exposure — is secondary.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking1,488 words
48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: Drug Safety Disclosure Immediate Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance supersede short-term financial considerations. Deliberate concealment creates greater legal liability, catastrophic reputational risk, and preventable patient deaths.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 5.31,346 words
If the Transistor Had Arrived in 1920 The Premise: Why 1920 Was Nearly Impossible Before tracing effects, note the counterfactual requires heroic assumptions. The transistor depended on quantum mechanics (solid-state band theory, ~1928-1933), ultrapure semiconductor materials (zone refining, 1950s), and wartime radar…
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking1,755 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual History The First Decade (1920-1930): Seeds of Revolution Immediate Technological Effects: Bell Labs' 1920 demonstration of point-contact transistors would initially seem like a curiosity.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GLM 5.3851 words
3-Month Advanced Longevity & Performance Optimization Protocol Note: This is an educational framework. Get baseline bloodwork and consult a physician before starting supplements/fasting, especially with any medical conditions or medications.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking1,281 words
The Biohacker's 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol CRITICAL DISCLAIMER: This is an advanced experimental protocol for experienced biohackers. All interventions require medical supervision, baseline blood work, and continuous biomarker monitoring. Many compounds mentioned exist in legal/regulatory gray areas.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GLM 5.31,164 words
The Software Engineer You've probably written autocomplete logic before, so you're right to be skeptical of the naive version: a Markov chain that looks up "what usually comes after 'the'" is trivially dumb.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking1,024 words
1. For the Experienced Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical—at its core, this is autocomplete on steroids, but the scale transforms the phenomenon entirely. Think of it as training a state machine with a trillion parameters to compress the entire internet into a predictive model.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GLM 5.3585 words
3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is neurologically incoherent. EEG sensors detect electrical activity on the scalp after neural firing occurs — you cannot decode intent "before" the brain generates it.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 Thinking624 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with analysis and concrete improvements: 1. The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is classic top-down market inflation that destroys credibility.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3
Input
$0.65
Output
$2.05
1.2× cheaper
Kimi K2 Thinking
Input
$0.60
1.1× cheaper
Output
$2.50

Kimi K2 Thinking wins input (1.1× cheaper)·GLM 5.3 wins output (1.2× cheaper)

Where to run it

32 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.330 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.65 in·$2.05 out·1M·99.8% upMMorph$0.71 in·$2.24 out·1M·99.8% upRRekafp8$0.76 in·$2.57 out·262k·99.4% upSSail Researchfp8$0.77 in·$4.00 out·1M·99.9% upNNovitafp8$0.78 in·$2.46 out·1M·99.9% upIio.netfp8$0.82 in·$2.77 out·262k·99.7% up
24 more hostsFewer hosts
PPhala$0.84 in·$2.64 out·1M·99.5% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upDDigitalOcean$0.91 in·$2.86 out·1M·99.8% upIInceptronfp4$1.04 in·$3.39 out·1M·99.4% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.05 in·$3.30 out·1M·99.5% upMMakorafp4$1.05 in·$4.20 out·980k·97.3% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.12 in·$3.52 out·1M·99.7% upAlibaba Cloud$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·100% upDDecartfp4$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.1% upFFriendli$1.26 in·$3.96 out·1M·100% upAAkashMLfp8$1.30 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.4% upBBasetenfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.7% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1.3M·99.8% upCCrusoefp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.3% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.5% upMistralnvfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.7% upModal$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99% upPParasailfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.1% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.1% upVVenice$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.8% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% up
Kimi K2 Thinking2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.60 in·$2.50 out·262k·100% upNNovitabf16$0.60 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI while Kimi K2 Thinking is developed by Moonshot AI. GLM 5.3 has a 1.3M token context window vs Kimi K2 Thinking's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.3 and Kimi K2 Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.3 costs $0.6538/M input tokens and Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.6/M input tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking is $0.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.3 and Kimi K2 Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2 Thinking logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2 Thinking logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2 Thinking logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 5.3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2 Thinking logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Kimi K2 Thinking logoKimi K3 logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K3Same lab
Kimi K2 Thinking logoKimi K2.7 Code logo
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoSonoma Dusk Alpha logo
GLM 5.3 vs Sonoma Dusk AlphaNew provider
GLM 5.3 logoSonoma Sky Alpha logo
GLM 5.3 vs Sonoma Sky AlphaNew provider
GLM 5.3 logoTNG R1T Chimera logo
GLM 5.3 vs TNG R1T ChimeraSame size
GLM 5.3 logoTrinity Large Preview logo
GLM 5.3 vs Trinity Large PreviewNew provider

Model pages

GLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.313 outputs, specs and price
Kimi K2 Thinking logo
Kimi K2 Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed