GLM 5vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than GLM 5 at $0.00015/M vs $0.8/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 5 | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.8/M tokens | $0.00015/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.56/M tokens | $0.00085/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GLM 5
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs 3012x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 5
Input
$0.80
Output
$2.56
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
5333× cheaper
Output
$0.001
3012× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 5333× input, 3012× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji
GLM 5
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
54%Vocabulary57%
17wSentence Length18w
0.37Hedging0.40
6.3Bold5.9
4.7Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.45
0.60Headings1.07
0.18Transitions0.11
Based on 22 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
GLM 5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Cross-provider
GLM 5 vs Qwen3 CoderCross-provider
GLM 5 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashCross-provider
GLM 5 vs Qwen3 Coder NextCross-provider