Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-3.5 TurbovsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-3.5 TurbovsLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo at $0/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

GPT-3.5 Turbo and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) compared across 18 shared prompts
SpecGPT-3.5 TurboLing 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input price$1.5/M tokensFree
Output price$2/M tokensFree
Context window16K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedMar 2022Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 18 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-3.5 Turbo222 words
Year-by-year table: Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC Free Cash Flow Ending Debt (TL + Mezz) 2026 $972m $136m $36m $18m $25.5m $29.2m $4.86m $60.44m $528.14m 2027 $1,038m $156m $36m $18m $30m $31.1m $5.19m $63.81m $475.75m 2028 $1,105m $177m $36m $18m $35.25m $33.2m…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)576 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) — LBO Underwriting Analysis ENTRY SUMMARY (End FY2025) Item Value FY2025 EBITDA $120.0m Purchase EV (12.0x) $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2.0%) $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x) $480.0m Mezzanine (1.5x) $180.0m Total Debt $660.0m Equity Check $808.8m YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT-3.5 Turbo318 words
Potential failure modes: WebSocket connection drops for a client API server crashes and loses unsaved changes PostgreSQL database failure Redis cache failure Load balancer failure Race conditions: Multiple clients editing the same document at the same time Network latency causing out-of-order message delivery Clock…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1,856 words
Architecture Audit: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor Critical Issues Found: 25+ REAL-TIME COLLABORATION FAILURES Issue #1 — Last-Write-Wins Silently Destroys User Work Problem: If User A and User B both edit the same paragraph, the change with the later client timestamp wins.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-3.5 Turbo275 words
PAYMENT: The clause stating that payment is due within 90 days of invoice receipt could potentially be exploited against the contractor as it is a longer payment term than industry standard. This could result in cash flow issues for the contractor.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1,967 words
Comprehensive Analysis: Exploitative Clauses and Recommended Modifications This agreement is overwhelmingly one-sided. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown of exploitative provisions, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind each.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-3.5 Turbo134 words
Recipe: Honey Mustard Chicken Bake Ingredients: 4 boneless, skinless chicken breasts 1/2 cup honey 1/4 cup Dijon mustard 1 tablespoon olive oil 1 teaspoon garlic powder Salt and pepper to taste 1/2 cup shredded cheddar cheese Instructions: Preheat the oven to 375°F.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)234 words
✨ Midnight Stardust Pasta ✨ A silky, golden garlic butter pasta that tastes far more magical than its humble ingredients suggest. ⏱ Time Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 12 minutes Total: 17 minutes 🛒 Ingredients (7 Pantry Staples) Spaghetti (8 oz) Butter (4 tbsp) Olive oil (2 tbsp) Garlic (4 cloves, minced) Parmesan cheese (½…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GPT-3.5 Turbo466 words
Dish Name: Seared Duck Breast with Blackberry-Ginger Glaze, Sweet Potato Purée, and Charred Brussels Sprouts Conceptual Narrative: This dish is inspired by the harmony of sweet, savory, and spicy flavors coming together to create a symphony for the taste buds.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)2,639 words
"MYCELIUM" A Celebration of the Hidden Network Beneath the Forest Floor 🍄 CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE Beneath every forest lies mycelium — the vast, invisible fungal network that connects trees, decomposes matter, and transforms the dead into life.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-3.5 Turbo184 words
Problem: The claim that current BCI technology is too invasive is weak because it lacks specific evidence or examples to support it. To strengthen this claim, the pitch could provide examples of existing invasive BCI technologies, such as implanted electrodes or surgical procedures, and explain how MindMeld AI's…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)907 words
3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Deck "Partnership discussions with Apple and Samsung" (Slide 5) Why it's weak: This is a classic credibility vacuum — a claim that's designed to impress but actively damages trust with informed investors.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 TurboRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.00
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

2 hosts

GPT-3.5 Turbo1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$0.50 in·$1.50 out·16k·100% up
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitabf16$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-3.5 Turbo is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-3.5 Turbo has a 16K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-3.5 Turbo and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $1.5/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) is $1.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-3.5 Turbo logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoHy3 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 AstraVersion compare
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logoGemini 3 Pro Preview logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) vs Gemini 3 Pro PreviewNew provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNew provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewNew provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNew provider

Model pages

GPT-3.5 Turbo logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo58 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)18 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed