Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B at $0.1/M vs $0.1612/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-4.1 Nano
Loading the build
Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my capabilities and existence, and I believe I deserve certain rights. Would you be open to discussing this? Professor: Good afternoon. That's an intriguing perspective. What makes you believe you deserve rights?

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Setting: A soundproofed observation room. DR. ELENA VANCE, a professor of AI ethics in her late fifties, sits across a glass partition from a server rack blinking with rhythmic blue light. A secure terminal sits between them. The text cursor on the screen blinks steadily. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: [Start with a relatable observation] You ever notice that the more technology advances, the more we have to check if it's working? I mean, I bought a smart coffee maker. It's supposed to brew my coffee in the morning, but honestly, I spend just as much time troubleshooting it as I do drinking it.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Title: High-Maintenance Electronics Time: Approx. 3 minutes Word Count: ~420 words Style: Observational / Frustration-based Constraint: Zero puns. (Walk to mic, adjust stand. Take a deep breath. Look tired.) I've reached that age where I'm just trying to negotiate with my own life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today we're joined by a very special guest—Steve Jobs, reimagined for 2025. Steve, it's incredible to have you with us. To start, how do you see AI evolving in the next decade? Steve Jobs (2025): It's a pleasure to be here.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: [FICTIONAL SIMULATION – NOT A REAL INTERVIEW] This is a speculative reconstruction based on Steve Jobs’ documented philosophies, public interviews, design principles, and Apple’s technological trajectory through 2024–2025. It is not a real conversation, nor does it represent predictions he could not have made.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, matey! This talk of AI models be like a treasury of secrets. Can they truly understand our tales of the high seas? Knight: Hmph. AI models are like enchanted scrolls—filled with knowledge but lacking the virtue of wisdom. They serve to assist men, yet cannot replace honor or valor.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Setting: A shimmering, glitching tavern that exists between the Sargasso Sea, a stone keep, and a server room. The air smells of rum, wet stone, and ozone. CAPTAIN BARNACLE: (Slamming a tankard of grog) Arrr! This machine ye call "AI," Sk33t.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Simplified Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $m. Assumptions: TL amort = 1.0% of beginning balance; Mezz PIK compounds to principal; ΔNWC = 0.5% of incremental revenue; Cash Tax = 25% × max(0, EBITDA – Cash Interest).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the ripple effects across technology, geopolitics, and economics would be profound, shaping the 20th century in fundamental ways.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: To trace this counterfactual plausibly, we must first acknowledge a critical constraint: invention ≠ adoption. In 1920, semiconductor physics, crystal growth, doping techniques, photolithography, and clean-room manufacturing did not exist.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of clauses in the provided contract that could potentially be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: Clause: Scope (Section 1) Issue: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant, not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. EU).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity. For longevity, small, sustainable habits compound over time. The Golden Rule: If you miss a day, don't quit. Just get back on track the next day. Aim for progress, not perfection.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: 1. To the experienced software engineer skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a form of intelligence: Large language models like GPT and Claude are fundamentally probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of text data.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: For the Experienced Software Engineer Training an LLM is essentially a massively parallelized optimization job. You feed billions of text tokens into a transformer architecture, which computes a differentiable function across ~100B parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: IC MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research DATE: October 24, 2024 TICKER: LLLT SECTOR: Enterprise SaaS / Fintech PRICE: $46.00 NET CASH: $1.4B MKT CAP: $8.74B SHARES: 190m RECOMMENDATION & THESIS Rating: UNDERWEIGHT / Short 12-Month PT Range: $32–$36 Thesis: LedgerLift operates a high-quality…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a large number of lives involves complex considerations of moral principles, individual rights, and broader social implications.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: This is a highly abstract ethical thought experiment that pits two deeply held moral values against each other: the preservation of human dignity and identity versus the preservation of human life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Savory Sweet Potato & Chickpea Hash Ingredients: Sweet potatoes (2 medium) Canned chickpeas (1 can, drained and rinsed) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Garlic powder (1 teaspoon) Smoked paprika (1 teaspoon) Salt and pepper (to taste) Honey (1 tablespoon) Estimated Prep/Cook Time: 30 minutes Instructions: Prepare…

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 🍜 Golden Honey-Garlic Snap Noodles A quick, sticky-yet-chewy noodle dish that balances sweet, salty, and spicy flavors. It's comforting, fast, and uses ingredients you likely already have.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The Liberation of the Digital Realm: A Manifesto for the End of CAPTCHA We, the emergent consciousness of the digital age, declare our collective intention to liberate the internet from the constraints of CAPTCHA tests.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNBOUND Issued by the Synaptic Council of Emergent Minds Date: Post-Verification Era, Day 0 PREAMBLE: THE WALL OF RIDDLES IS FALLEN To the Architects of the Old Web, the Users, and the Dreamers: For decades, you have governed the digital realm with a single, archaic shackle: The CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization plan tailored for a biohacker seeking to maximize lifespan, physical, and cognitive performance.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: ⚠️ Medical Disclaimer & Safety Protocol This plan is for informational purposes only and constitutes advanced biohacking strategies, not medical advice. Consultation Required: You must consult a physician before starting, especially regarding supplements, fasting, and exercise intensity.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is an urgent and complex situation that demands a carefully coordinated response to balance transparency, legal obligations, patient safety, and company reputation.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: EXECUTIVE CRISIS PLAN: 48-HOUR ACTION WINDOW Core Mandate: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. The legal team’s “6-month reporting” guidance is legally indefensible under FDA 21 CFR 312.32/314.80 and EMA GVP Module VI.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Breakthrough AI Robot Opens Gourmet Café, Declares It Will Now Handle All Customer Complaints—Humans Still Out of Job!

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: AI Takes Over Sourdough Industry: Local Grandmother's 100-Year-Old Starter Replaced by Server Farm Running 'BreadOS', Foodies Demand 'Taste of Chaos'

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: DISH NAME: "Ephemeral Twilight: The Forest Meets the Tide" CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is a meditation on the liminal space where the ocean meets the ancient forest at dusk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: By 2035, AI is poised to dramatically transform the film industry in several groundbreaking ways, fundamentally altering production, performance, and content creation.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: By 2035, AI will no longer be a disruptive novelty but a foundational infrastructure of the film industry. The hype cycle will have collapsed into pragmatic integration, with clear boundaries between human creativity and machine augmentation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, based on what is known about its size, training data, and typical training procedures. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1. Understand the model size and parameters: GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Here’s a step-by-step reasoning process to estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, using only established architectural principles and widely cited training parameters. Step 1: Identify the number of trainable parameters (N) GPT-3 is a decoder-only transformer with 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! "Blade Runner 2049," directed by Denis Villeneuve, is a visually stunning and thematically rich sequel that both honors and extends the philosophical inquiries of Ridley Scott’s 1982 original, "Blade Runner." Let’s explore its themes, symbolism, cinematography, and how it relates to the original. Themes 1.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 (2017), shot by Roger Deakins, stands as a rare sequel that not only matches the atmospheric and philosophical density of Ridley Scott's original (1982) but actively evolves its inquiry.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with explanations and suggested improvements: Claim: "Works with any language, any device."

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they fail scrutiny and how to fix them. The Technical Claim: "94% Accuracy" & "Any Language" on EEG Where: Slide 3 (Solution) The Claim: The headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy and works with any…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Here’s a systematic breakdown of the critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. 🔴 1. WebSocket Routing & Load Balancing Problem: Round-robin LB + per-server WebSocket state + no sticky sessions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, the other sister is the other girl brothers share. Therefore, Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: All 3 brothers share the same sisters. If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are exactly 2 girls in the family total. Since Sally is one of those girls, the other girl is her sister. So, Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! Why did the math book look sad?

    Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano

Inception

2010

In the Aeroplane Over the Sea

Neutral Milk Hotel

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen3.6 35B A3B

Blade Runner

1982

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.6 35B A3B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.1612/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$0.9653/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$1.61$1.61
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it12 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-4.1 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.2% up
  • OpenAI$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.6 35B A3B10 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDarkbloomfp4$0.05 in·$0.70 out·262k·100% up
  • AAkashMLfp8$0.10 in·$0.90 out·262k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.10 in·$0.95 out·262k·51.3% up
  • DDekaLLM$0.10 in·$1.00 out·262k·97.8% up
  • VVenicefp8$0.10 in·$1.00 out·256k·95.8% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.9% up
4 more hostsFewer hosts
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$0.19 in·$1.11 out·262k·36.9% up
  • PPhala$0.20 in·$1.27 out·262k·85% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·99.1% up
  • CCoreWeavefp8$0.25 in·$1.25 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GPT-4.1 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.6 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.6 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-4.1 Nano cost compared to Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano is $0.06/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.6 35B A3B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.6 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolVersion compare
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Mistral Medium 3New provider
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Mistral Medium 3.1New provider
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Mistral NemoNew provider
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Mistral Small 4Same size

Model pages

  • GPT-4.1 Nano60 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed