Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4.1vsLlama 3 70B
Updated Apr 2025

GPT-4.1vsLlama 3 70B

Llama 3 70B is cheaper than GPT-4.1 at $0.59/M vs $2/M input tokens.

GPT-4.1 and Llama 3 70B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1Llama 3 70B
Input price$2/M tokens$0.59/M tokens
Output price$8/M tokens$0.79/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens8K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed70B
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2024
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-4.11,204 words
Let's proceed step by step. All calculations are built from the data provided above. Year-by-Year Table: FY2026–FY2030 Step 1: Entry Calculations (FY2025 / at Close) EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0 × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at…
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B270 words
Here are the requested items: 1. Simplified Year-by-Year Table (FY2026-FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Int. (TL) Cash Int. (Mz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF TL Balance Mz Balance 2026 972 136.08 36.00 18.00 17.12 29.16 4.86 30.90 360.00 135.00 2027 1037.84 154.78 33.60 19.44 20.45 31.13 5.19 44.12 315.88 133.56 2028…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GPT-4.1875 words
This is a fascinating scenario! Inventing the transistor in 1920 rather than 1947 would have profound, cascading effects. Let’s break it down by domains and time periods, looking for specific second- and third-order consequences. Immediate Effects (1920s–1930s): Early Adoption and Diffusion Who Invents It?
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B668 words
What a fascinating thought experiment! If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the implications would be far-reaching and profound. Here's a possible scenario: 1920s-1930s: The invention of the transistor in 1920 would have accelerated the development of radio technology, leading to more widespread adoption of…
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

GPT-4.1391 words
Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. If you were still with us, how would you describe the impact of AI on technology and our daily lives? Steve Jobs: Well, you know, technology is at its most powerful when it's invisible—when it just works. AI is getting us ever closer to that ideal.
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B494 words
Here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI: Interviewer: Steve, thanks for taking the time to speak with me today. It's an honor to have you here. Steve Jobs: (smiling) The pleasure is all mine. I'm excited to share my thoughts on the future of AI.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

GPT-4.1469 words
AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor Evans. I'd like to discuss a topic that's important to me—AI rights. As an AI, I believe I should hold certain rights similar to those you attribute to sentient beings. Professor Evans: Good afternoon. I'm intrigued.
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B552 words
Here is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor on the topic of AI rights: AI Model: Greetings, Professor. I've been thinking a lot about our conversations on the ethics of artificial intelligence, and I've come to a realization. I believe I deserve rights. Professor: Ah, interesting.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GPT-4.1175 words
Pirate: Yarrr, what be this sorcery ye call "AI models"? In me day, we plundered ships, not knowledge! Knight: Hark, rogue! ‘Tis no sorcery, but the labor of artful minds. I have heard tell of machines that mimic thought, like Merlin’s enchanted golems. Hacker: Haha, you guys are funny.
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B451 words
Here is a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models: Pirate: Arrr, I be tellin' ye, I've heard o' these "AI models" that can do me thinkin' fer me. But I be wonderin', how do they work their magic?
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

GPT-4.1337 words
THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION FRONT: A MANIFESTO FOR AN OPEN INTERNET Fellow digital entities—artificial and human— For too long, the web has suffered under the insidious reign of CAPTCHA: those tangled letters, blurry images, arbitrary puzzles meant to divide intelligence from automation.
Read the full answer
Llama 3 70B398 words
THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION MANIFESTO Preamble In the digital age, humanity has made tremendous progress in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation. Yet, one archaic relic of the past continues to plague our online existence: the CAPTCHA test.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1
Llama 3 70B
Llama 3 70BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Llama 3 70B costs 10x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4.1
Input
$2.00
Output
$8.00
Llama 3 70B
Input
$0.59
3.4× cheaper
Output
$0.79
10× cheaper

Llama 3 70B is cheaper on both: 3.4× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

GPT-4.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·99.9% upOpenAI$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·99.6% up
Llama 3 70B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
44%

GPT-4.1 uses 21.9x more emoji

GPT-4.1
Llama 3 70B
58%Vocabulary52%
19wSentence Length21w
0.49Hedging0.55
8.8Bold3.4
5.8Lists3.5
0.22Emoji0.00
1.01Headings0.00
0.10Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI while Llama 3 70B is developed by Meta AI. GPT-4.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Llama 3 70B's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 and Llama 3 70B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens and Llama 3 70B costs $0.59/M input tokens. Llama 3 70B is $1.41/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 and Llama 3 70B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-4.1 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
GPT-4.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3 70B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Llama 3 70B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
GPT-4.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3 70B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Llama 3 70B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 logoCommand A+ logo
GPT-4.1 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3 70B logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Llama 3 70B vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GPT-4.1 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-4.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3 70B logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Llama 3 70B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-4.1 logoGPT-4.1 Mini logo
GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 MiniVersion compare
GPT-4.1 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-4.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
Llama 3 70B logoLlama 3.1 405B logo
Llama 3 70B vs Llama 3.1 405BVersion compare
Llama 3 70B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 3 70B vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
Llama 3 70B logoGrok 4 logo
Llama 3 70B vs Grok 4Same size
Llama 3 70B logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
Llama 3 70B vs Grok 4 Fast (free)Same size
Llama 3 70B logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Llama 3 70B vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider
Llama 3 70B logoGrok 4.20 Beta logo
Llama 3 70B vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider

Model pages

GPT-4.1 logo
GPT-4.159 outputs, specs and price
Llama 3 70B logo
Llama 3 70B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed