GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Nemo
Compare GPT-4.1 by OpenAI against Mistral Nemo by Mistral AI, in 3 community votes, gpt-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Mistral Nemo?
GPT-4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. Context windows: 1048K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4.1 and Mistral Nemo
GPT-4.1 is made by openai while Mistral Nemo is from mistral. GPT-4.1 has a 1048K token context window compared to Mistral Nemo's 128K. On pricing, GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. In community voting, In 3 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 3 community votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4.1 leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Mistral Nemo is cheaper on both — 67× input, 114× output
Pick GPT-4.1. In 3 blind votes, GPT-4.1 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-4.1 particularly excels in Web Design. Mistral Nemo is 114x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT-4.1 uses 23.7x more emoji
