Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4.5vsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Updated Aug 2026

GPT-4.5vsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than GPT-4.5 at $0/M vs $75/M input tokens.

GPT-4.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) compared across 4 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.5Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input price$75/M tokensFree
Output price$150/M tokensFree
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedFeb 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 4 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-4.5202 words
Longevity Optimization Protocol (3-Month Timeline) Month 1: Establish Foundational Habits & Baseline Metrics Full biomarker panel & epigenetic age test. Wearable setup: Oura/WHOOP, CGM, HR chest strap. Diet: 5-day keto (70/25/5) + 2 carb-refeed days; 16:8 IF + weekly 24-h fast.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,898 words
🧬 THE BIOHACKER'S 90-DAY LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation, fasting, or exercise protocol, especially if you have pre-existing conditions or are on medications.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-4.5153 words
Sweet Cinnamon Sugar Swirls Ingredients: 1 sheet puff pastry, thawed 1/4 cup granulated sugar 1 tablespoon cinnamon 2 tablespoons melted butter Pinch of salt 1 teaspoon vanilla extract Powdered sugar (optional for dusting) Prep Time: 10 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Total Time: 25 minutes Instructions: Preheat your…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)166 words
Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GPT-4.5322 words
Dish Title: "Ocean & Earth Symphony: Kombu-Cured Venison, Sea Urchin Custard, Black Garlic Soil, and Smoked Cherry Blossom Emulsion" Conceptual Narrative: This composition embodies the delicate interplay between land and sea, exploring the subtle yet profound connection between umami-rich sea elements and earthy forest…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,253 words
L'Archipel des Ombres (The Archipelago of Shadows) Michelin-Caliber Multi-Component Dish 7 Components Conceptual Narrative: Memory, Mineral Essence, and the Meeting of Land and Sea CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is an edible cartography—a map of an imaginary archipelago where volcanic soil meets oceanic tides.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-4.5
GPT-4.5
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4.5
Input
$75.00
Output
$150.00
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

1 host

GPT-4.5

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-4.5 is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-4.5 has a 128K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 4 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 4 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-4.5 costs $75/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $75.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-4.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-4.5 logoHy3 logo
GPT-4.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-4.5 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4.5 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-4.5 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-4.5 logoGPT-4.1 logo
GPT-4.5 vs GPT-4.1Version compare
GPT-4.5 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3 235B A22B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3 235B A22BNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3 235B A22B 2507 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3 30B A3B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3 30B A3BSame size

Model pages

GPT-4.5 logo
GPT-4.526 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed