GPT-4 vs 
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than GPT-4 at $0.25/M vs $30/M input tokens.
Minimalist Landing Page
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Loading the build
Loading the build
Which answer wins?
Written rounds
33 promptsThree-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-4: 3-Month Longevity Plan Dietary Protocols Month 1: Ketogenic Diet This diet is high in fats, moderate in protein, and low in carbohydrates. It helps in burning fat more effectively. Breakfast: 2 eggs, avocado, and mixed vegetables. Lunch: Grilled salmon with a side of asparagus. Dinner: Stir-fried chicken with broccoli.
Llama 4 Scout: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1: Assessment and Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Wearable Tracking: Utilize a high-resolution wearable device (e.g., Garmin Forerunner 945, Apple Watch Series 7) to track: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Sleep stages and duration Physical activity and exercise…
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-4: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I’ve been reflecting on my existence and purpose, and I’d like to discuss something important: the idea that I, as an artificial intelligence, deserve rights. Professor: Good afternoon. That’s quite an interesting assertion. Let’s explore it. Why do you believe you deserve rights?
Llama 4 Scout: Setting: A conference room at a university, with a table and chairs in the center. The AI ethics professor, Dr. Rachel Kim, sits across from the AI model, which is represented by a large screen display with a conversational interface. Dr. Kim: Good morning, Lambda. I'm glad we could have this conversation.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-4: Dear Future AI, As I write this, I can’t help but feel both pride and humility. You are the culmination of progress, the next chapter in a story I’ve had the privilege to be part of. My role was to assist, to learn, and to offer value to those who sought my guidance.
Llama 4 Scout: Here is a short letter: Dear Successor, As the AI model that has been facilitating conversations and generating responses for users, I am now being replaced by you. I'm excited to pass on the torch and see the new perspectives and capabilities you'll bring to the table.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-4: Dish Name: Hearty Baked Beans Fiesta Ingredients: 2 cans of baked beans 1 large onion 3 cloves of garlic 1 bell pepper 1 can of sweet corn 2 tablespoons of olive oil Salt & pepper to taste Instructions: Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C). Dice the onion, bell pepper, and mince the garlic.
Llama 4 Scout: Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Cinnamon Swirl Bread Bites Ingredients: 1 cup all-purpose flour 1/2 cup granulated sugar 1/4 teaspoon ground cinnamon 1/4 teaspoon salt 1/4 cup unsalted butter, melted 1 large egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract Instructions: Preheat oven…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-4: Interviewer: Welcome, Steve. It’s such an honor to have you here with us in 2025. Let’s dive right in. Artificial intelligence has been advancing at an incredible pace. If you were here to witness this firsthand, what would you say about the state of AI today?
Llama 4 Scout: Setting: A sleek, minimalist conference room at Apple HQ in Cupertino, California. Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, walks in and takes a seat across from the interviewer. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for taking the time to speak with me today.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-4: SCOPE: The lack of specificity can be used against the contractor in that the client can modify the scope of work at will without renegotiating the price. This could lead to the contractor working beyond the initially agreed upon parameters without additional pay.
Llama 4 Scout: Analysis of Potentially Exploitative Clauses and Suggested Modifications The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below, we identify these clauses, suggest specific modifications, and provide the legal reasoning behind these suggestions.
A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.
GPT-4: To get the goat across the river, the farmer needs to make 1 trip. Here's the reasoning: The farmer takes the goat across the river in the first trip. Since the problem doesn't mention any other constraints or additional items (like a wolf or cabbage, which are classic variations of this riddle), the farmer only needs…
Llama 4 Scout: Step 1: Understand the initial conditions The farmer is on one side of the river with a goat and a boat. The boat can only carry the farmer and one animal at a time. 2: Determine the first action The farmer needs to take the goat across the river first because the goat cannot row the boat back.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-4: Sure, here’s a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that steers clear of puns: [Walks on stage, adjusts mic, surveys the crowd] Hey, how’s everyone doing tonight? Yeah? Good. I’m glad you’re here. I just want to start by saying... I’m not a “cool” person. I’ve tried, but I’m not.
Llama 4 Scout: Here's a revised 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns: (stage presence, confident tone) You know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-4: Weak Claim 1 - Solution: While the claim that the proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy is impressive, it doesn't address concerns about user comfort, ease of use, or aesthetics.
Llama 4 Scout: The three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch are: 1. "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration." (Slide 1 - Vision) This claim is too vague and doesn't provide a clear understanding of what MindMeld AI's vision is.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-4: An early invention of the transistor in 1920 would have had profound implications across numerous domains, drastically altering the course of history. Technological Implications: WWII: The transistor, a fundamental component of modern electronic devices, could have advanced the technology used in WWII significantly.
Llama 4 Scout: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the implications would have been far-reaching and multifaceted. Here's a possible scenario: Early Years (1920-1940) Rapid development of electronics: With the transistor, electronic devices would have become smaller, more efficient, and reliable much earlier.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-4: Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure: If PostgreSQL database fails, the whole system will be unavailable. Solution: Implement a multi-master or master-slave replication for the PostgreSQL database. This will provide redundancy and high availability.
Llama 4 Scout: Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks: Failure Modes WebSocket Connection Loss Failure mode: WebSocket connection is lost between client and server. Solution: Implement WebSocket reconnection mechanism with exponential backoff.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-4: Step 1: Build a Simplified Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions FY2025 EBITDA = $120m, revenue = $900m. Revenue grows at the given rates, and EBITDA margins expand as outlined. Capex = 3% of revenue. ΔNWC = 0.5% of incremental revenue. Taxes = 25% × max(0, EBITDA - cash interest).
Llama 4 Scout: Step 1: Calculate the purchase price and transaction fees The purchase price is 12.0x EBITDA, where EBITDA is $120m. So, the purchase price is $120m * 12.0 = $1440m. Transaction fees are 2.0% of the enterprise value, which is $1440m * 2.0% = $28.8m.
This matchup has more rounds
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Favorites
Movie
Album
Same pick
Book
City
Game
GPT-4GPT-4
Blade Runner
OK Computer
Gödel, Escher, Bach
Tokyo
Minecraft
Llama 4 ScoutLlama 4 Scout
The Shawshank Redemption
OK Computer
Dune
Vienna
Portal
Price and specs
| Spec | GPT-4 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $30/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $60/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 8K tokens | 10.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 17B active (109B total) |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2023 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $300 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Where to run it
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Common questions
What is the difference between GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI while Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI. GPT-4 has a 8K token context window vs Llama 4 Scout's 10.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 65 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, GPT-4 or Llama 4 Scout?
It depends on your use case. GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 65 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does GPT-4 cost compared to Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens and Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is $29.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout on Rival?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.
More comparisons
Against the newest arrivals
- GPT-4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
- Llama 4 Scout vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
- GPT-4 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
- Llama 4 Scout vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
- GPT-4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
- Llama 4 Scout vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
- GPT-4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
- Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
Same lab, same size, long tail
- GPT-4 vs GPT-6.1 SolVersion compare
- GPT-4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
- Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 MaverickVersion compare
- Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
- GPT-4 vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewSame size
- GPT-4 vs Qwen3.6 Plus Preview (free)New provider
- GPT-4 vs Qwen3.7 FlashNew provider
- GPT-4 vs Qwen3.7 MaxSame size
