GPT-4 vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-4 by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 8K vs 10.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4 or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 8K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4 and Llama 4 Scout

GPT-4 is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-4 has a 8K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.

Our Verdict
GPT-4
GPT-4
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Llama 4 Scout is 120x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
86%

Llama 4 Scout uses 30.0x more headings

GPT-4
Llama 4 Scout
59%Vocabulary43%
18wSentence Length42w
1.10Hedging0.81
0.8Bold4.1
2.5Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.30
0.45Transitions0.04
Based on 15 + 10 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4Llama 4 Scout

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions