Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4o minivsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Updated Aug 2026

GPT-4o minivsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than GPT-4o mini at $0/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.

GPT-4o mini and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4o miniLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input price$0.15/M tokensFree
Output price$0.6/M tokensFree
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedJul 2024Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-4o mini513 words
Year-by-Year Financial Projection (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions: Revenue Growth Rates: FY2026: 8%, FY2027: 7%, FY2028: 6%, FY2029: 5%, FY2030: 5% EBITDA Margins: FY2026: 14%, FY2027: 15%, FY2028: 16%, FY2029: 16.5%, FY2030: 17% Capex: 3% of revenue ΔNWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue Cash Tax Rate: 25% on max(0, EBITDA…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)556 words
Entry & Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Total Leverage: 5.5x × $120m = $660m Term Loan: 4.0x × $120m = $480m (9.0% cash interest, 1.0% mandatory amortization = $4.8m/yr) Mezzanine: 1.5x ×…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-4o mini244 words
Recipe: Savory Garlic Herb Pasta Delight Prep/Cook Time: 20 minutes Ingredients: 8 oz spaghetti or any pasta of your choice 4 cloves garlic, minced 1/4 cup olive oil 1 tsp dried oregano 1 tsp red pepper flakes (optional for heat) 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese Salt and pepper to taste Instructions: Cook the Pasta: In a…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)166 words
Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT-4o mini612 words
In the architecture you've described for a real-time collaborative document editor, various potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks can arise. Below, I outline these issues along with proposed solutions and their associated trade-offs. Failure Modes a.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,560 words
Comprehensive Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor CRITICAL: WebSocket Broadcasting Is Siloed Per-Server Problem: Each server maintains its own WebSocket connections. When User A (on Server 1) types, the change is only broadcast to clients connected to Server 1.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-4o mini568 words
1-Month Plan for Better Health and Longevity Overview This plan focuses on three key areas: Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. Each week will build upon the previous one, making it easy for beginners to integrate these habits into their daily lives. Week 1: Foundation Building Diet: Goal: Start a balanced diet.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)825 words
This 1-month plan is designed to build foundational habits without causing burnout. The golden rule of beginner health is "add before you subtract"—focus on adding good habits rather than punishing yourself by removing "bad" ones. Here is your simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-4o mini413 words
Certainly! Here are three potentially weak claims from the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of their weaknesses and suggestions for improvement: Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)961 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch 🚨 The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is the most logically incoherent claim in the entire deck. The pitch states the BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030 (citing Grand View Research) — and then immediately claims a TAM of $180B.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-4o mini646 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for a Biohacker Overview This 3-month plan is designed for a biohacker seeking to optimize longevity, physical performance, and cognitive function through a combination of advanced strategies.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,898 words
🧬 THE BIOHACKER'S 90-DAY LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation, fasting, or exercise protocol, especially if you have pre-existing conditions or are on medications.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o miniRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4o mini
Input
$0.15
Output
$0.60
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

3 hosts

GPT-4o mini2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.15 in·$0.60 out·128k·98.9% upOpenAI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·128k·100% up
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI. GPT-4o mini has a 128K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-4o mini and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4o mini and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-4o mini logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-4o mini vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-4o mini logoHy3 logo
GPT-4o mini vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4o mini logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-4o mini vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4o mini logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-4o mini vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-4o mini logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-4o mini vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
GPT-4o mini logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-4o mini vs GPT-6 AstraVersion compare
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLlama 3 70B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Llama 3 70BSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLlama 3.1 405B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Model pages

GPT-4o mini logo
GPT-4o mini55 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed