GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT-4o mini by OpenAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 13 community votes, gpt-4o mini wins 55% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
GPT-4o mini is the better choice overall, winning 55% of 13 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
GPT-4o mini is made by openai while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. GPT-4o mini has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. On pricing, GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 13 community votes, GPT-4o mini wins 55% of head-to-head duels.
In 13 community votes, GPT-4o mini wins 55% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4o mini leads in Reasoning, while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 13+ human preference judgments for this pair.
GPT-4o mini has the edge overall. In 13 blind votes, GPT-4o mini wins 55% of the time.
Pick GPT-4o mini for Reasoning. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
