GPT-4o (Omni)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, in 1 community votes, gpt-4o (omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 33K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen3 235B A22B?
GPT-4o (Omni) is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Context windows: 128K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 235B A22B
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K. In community voting, In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)Winner
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
Pick GPT-4o (Omni). In 1 blind votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
79%
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 72.0x more hedging
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 235B A22B
54%Vocabulary68%
18wSentence Length9w
0.72Hedging0.00
7.3Bold5.8
5.6Lists3.7
0.03Emoji0.74
1.40Headings0.00
0.26Transitions0.12
Based on 24 + 2 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ