GPT-4o (Omni)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Coder
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen3 Coder by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen3 coder wins 88% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen3 Coder?
Qwen3 Coder is the better choice overall, winning 88% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen3 Coder
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen3 Coder is from qwen. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 88% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 88% of head-to-head duels. Qwen3 Coder leads in Reasoning, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Reasoning: Qwen3 Coder wins 80% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen3 Coder wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen3 CoderWinner
GPT-4o (Omni)Runner-up
Pick Qwen3 Coder. In 8 blind votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 88% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 Coder particularly excels in Image Generation, Reasoning. Qwen3 Coder is 11x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Qwen3 Coder uses 4.6x more emoji
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 Coder
54%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length72w
0.72Hedging0.61
7.3Bold4.7
5.6Lists5.6
0.03Emoji0.12
1.40Headings1.43
0.26Transitions0.20
Based on 24 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ