GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 9.1x more emoji

GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
54%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length14w
0.72Hedging0.39
7.3Bold6.9
5.6Lists4.2
0.03Emoji0.23
1.40Headings0.93
0.26Transitions0.17
Based on 24 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4o (Omni)Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions