Rival
Sign Up

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GPT-5

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against GPT-5 by OpenAI, context windows of 262K vs 400K, tested across 46 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or GPT-5?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and GPT-5 are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 262K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and GPT-5

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while GPT-5 is from openai. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPT-5
GPT-5

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPT-5
54%Vocabulary65%
14wSentence Length13w
0.39Hedging0.20
6.9Bold0.2
4.2Lists4.6
0.23Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.16
0.17Transitions0.03
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BGPT-5
FAQ
Keep going
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoMiniMax M1 logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M1New provider