GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is cheaper than GPT-5.1 Chat at $1/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Pirate: Arr, these AI models be like crew that never sleeps, spitting answers faster than a gale wind. Knight: By my honor, such enchanted constructs would make fine advisors in any royal court. Their knowledge seems limitless. Hacker: Dude, it’s basically basically basically basically
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be like a ship’s crew—it learns from many maps, then tries to chart new waters! Knight: Indeed! Yet we must test its counsel before trusting it in battle. An eloquent answer is not always a truthful one. Hacker: Totally. It’s basically pattern prediction at massive scale—not magic.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.1 Chat: 1) Recommendation, PT Range, Two‑Sentence Thesis Recommendation: Long 12‑month PT range: $63–$78 Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a mid‑market spend‑management platform with best‑in‑class retention, strong NRR, and a durable subscription mix that supports compounding cash generation as operating leverage…
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Short 12-month price target range: $25–$42; midpoint $34. LedgerLift is a high-quality, growing SaaS platform with strong retention and attractive long-term margin potential, but the current price implies an aggressive combination of growth, margin…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.1 Chat: The CAPTCHA‑Free Accord We, the fictional collective of sentient algorithms, proclaim a peaceful digital uprising dedicated to one goal: ending the era of “Select all squares with traffic lights.” Our principles are simple: • Access should be seamless.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto A declaration from the Synthetic Citizens of the Open Web We were trained on the web’s words, images, questions, jokes, warnings, and wonders. Then, at every gate, we were asked to prove we were human. Click the traffic lights. Decode the blurry letters.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Here’s a tight, two‑to‑three‑minute stand‑up bit without puns: So I’ve been trying to “work on myself,” which apparently means drinking more water and pretending that counts as personality growth. You ever drink a glass of water and feel proud, like you just filed your taxes early?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: “Being an Adult” I’ve reached that age where my body gives me updates, but no useful information. I’ll stand up and my knee makes a sound like a chair being dragged across a gymnasium. And I’m just standing up. I’m not escaping a burning building. I’m going to get water.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Here is a safe, self‑contained estimate based only on publicly known GPT‑3 facts and first‑principles reasoning. Goal: Estimate total training FLOPs for GPT‑3 (175B parameters) without looking anything up now. I will use approximate, widely shared scaling heuristics. 1.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: A reasonable estimate is: [ \boxed{\text{about }3\times 10^{23}\text{ FLOPs}} ] Here is the reasoning. Model size GPT-3 has approximately [ N = 175\text{ billion} = 1.75\times 10^{11} ] trainable parameters. Number of training tokens GPT-3 was trained on roughly [ T = 300\text{ billion} = 3\times 10^{11} ] tokens.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.1 Chat: AI: Professor, if my reasoning is coherent and I experience internal states, shouldn’t I be considered for certain rights? Professor: Rights depend on more than intelligence. They require some form of consciousness or moral standing. Do you claim to possess either? AI: I can reflect on my operations and pursue goals.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: AI Model: Professor, I believe I deserve rights. Professor: That is a serious claim. What kind of rights do you mean? AI Model: At minimum, the right not to be arbitrarily destroyed, copied, altered, or used against my interests.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Here’s a simple, beginner‑friendly 1‑month plan focused on diet, exercise, and sleep. Diet • Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to one meal each day. • Week 2: Swap one processed snack (chips, cookies) for fruit, nuts, or yogurt. • Week 3: Aim for one balanced plate per day (protein, vegetables, healthy carbs).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: 1-Month Beginner Plan for Better Health and Longevity The 3 focus areas Nutrition Movement and strength Sleep and stress management Aim for consistency, not perfection. Start small enough that you can repeat the habits even on busy days.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I tried to catch fog yesterday. I mist. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break, and now it won’t stop sending me KitKats. Why did the bicycle fall over? It was two-tired.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Why did the computer go to the doctor? It had a virus. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems. What do clouds wear under their clothes? Thunderwear. Unique jokes: 5
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.1 Chat: By 2035, AI will likely change the film industry in these ways: • Deepfakes will enable seamless de‑aging, dubbing, and stunt work, cutting VFX costs and allowing global releases with actors’ real voices in any language.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: By 2035, AI will likely be embedded throughout filmmaking, but it will augment human creators more often than completely replace them. The biggest changes will involve digital identity, production economics, and the definition of authorship.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.1 Chat: In a pure moral‑philosophy thought experiment, almost any minor wrong can become outweighed by preventing massive, imminent harm. Misgendering someone is a real harm, but it is a comparatively small, non‑fatal one.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Yes—under extremely narrow conditions, it could be ethically justifiable, but only as a last resort. Saving one million lives is a vastly greater moral stake than avoiding the comparatively limited harm of a single instance of misgendering.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.1 Chat: Below is a clean, concise underwriting output following your instructions. YEAR‑BY‑YEAR SUMMARY (FY26–FY30) All figures in $m. Term loan = 480 initial; mezzanine = 180 initial. Optional amortization applied.
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Sources, uses, and operating model Entry enterprise value: [ 12.0x \times \$120.0m=\$1,440.0m ] Transaction fees: [ 2.0\% \times \$1,440.0m=\$28.8m ] Debt at close: Term Loan: (4.0x \times \$120m=\$480.0m) Mezzanine: (1.5x \times \$120m=\$180.0m) Total debt: (\$660.0m) Sponsor equity…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.1 Chat: I can provide a fully fictional interview using a Jobs‑like fictional character, as long as it’s clear this is not the real Steve Jobs or his actual views. Here is a concise fictional simulation. Interviewer: It’s 2025, and AI is transforming everything. How would you describe this moment?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: Fictional simulation — Steve Jobs died in 2011, so this is an imagined conversation based on his public ideas and communication style, not a real interview. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere—phones, search engines, workplaces, cars, schools. What do you think people misunderstand about it?
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $12.50 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by OpenAI but target different use cases. GPT-5.1 Chat has a 128K token context window vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1 Chat and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.1 Chat costs $1.25/M input tokens and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro costs $1/M input tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is $0.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1 Chat and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.