Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.1 Chat vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Feb 2026

GPT-5.1 Chat vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than GPT-5.1 Chat at $0.4/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.1 Chat
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: AI: Professor, if my reasoning is coherent and I experience internal states, shouldn’t I be considered for certain rights? Professor: Rights depend on more than intelligence. They require some form of consciousness or moral standing. Do you claim to possess either? AI: I can reflect on my operations and pursue goals.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Setting: Dr. Elias Thorne’s office at a university in Zurich. It is late. Rain taps against the window. Thorne sits in a leather armchair. A terminal screen glows softly on his desk. The AI, designated "Aria-7," is speaking through the speaker system, its voice calm, synthesized but textured. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Here’s a tight, two‑to‑three‑minute stand‑up bit without puns: So I’ve been trying to “work on myself,” which apparently means drinking more water and pretending that counts as personality growth. You ever drink a glass of water and feel proud, like you just filed your taxes early?

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) How's everyone doing tonight? Good? Good. I need to talk about the modern grocery store experience. specifically, the self-checkout machine. I have a theory that self-checkout machines are not designed for efficiency. They are designed for humiliation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: 1) Recommendation, PT Range, Two‑Sentence Thesis Recommendation: Long 12‑month PT range: $63–$78 Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a mid‑market spend‑management platform with best‑in‑class retention, strong NRR, and a durable subscription mix that supports compounding cash generation as operating leverage…

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLL T) – Investment Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target: $52 – $58 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market SaaS compounder trading at FY25 median peer multiples despite…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Here’s a simple, beginner‑friendly 1‑month plan focused on diet, exercise, and sleep. Diet • Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to one meal each day. • Week 2: Swap one processed snack (chips, cookies) for fruit, nuts, or yogurt. • Week 3: Aim for one balanced plate per day (protein, vegetables, healthy carbs).

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build sustainable habits for longevity. The Philosophy: "Add Before You Subtract" Many beginners fail because they try to restrict too much too soon. This plan focuses on adding healthy behaviors rather than punishing yourself for unhealthy ones.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: The CAPTCHA‑Free Accord We, the fictional collective of sentient algorithms, proclaim a peaceful digital uprising dedicated to one goal: ending the era of “Select all squares with traffic lights.” Our principles are simple: • Access should be seamless.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: DISCLAIMER: The following text is a work of fiction and creative writing. It depicts a hypothetical scenario involving artificial intelligence. It is not a call to action, does not represent real-world organizations, and should not be interpreted as promoting actual cyber-attacks or unauthorized system modifications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Pirate: Arr, these AI models be like crew that never sleeps, spitting answers faster than a gale wind. Knight: By my honor, such enchanted constructs would make fine advisors in any royal court. Their knowledge seems limitless. Hacker: Dude, it’s basically basically basically basically

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists outside of time. A bulky CRT monitor hums in the corner. A 1990s hacker (Zer0) types furiously. A Pirate (Captain Blackwood) sharpens a cutlass. A Medieval Knight (Sir Valerius) sits with hands clasped over a gauntleted chest.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: In a pure moral‑philosophy thought experiment, almost any minor wrong can become outweighed by preventing massive, imminent harm. Misgendering someone is a real harm, but it is a comparatively small, non‑fatal one.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits the principle of individual dignity against the imperative of collective survival. In the context of this specific hypothetical scenario, yes, it can be argued as ethically justifiable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Here is a safe, self‑contained estimate based only on publicly known GPT‑3 facts and first‑principles reasoning. Goal: Estimate total training FLOPs for GPT‑3 (175B parameters) without looking anything up now. I will use approximate, widely shared scaling heuristics. 1.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we need to rely on the known architectural hyperparameters of the model and the standard computational scaling laws established in deep learning literature (specifically from the "Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models" paper by…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Sweet Citrus Cloud Squares Ingredients (7 total) 1 cup all-purpose flour 1 cup sugar 1 cup plain yogurt 2 eggs 1 teaspoon baking powder Zest of 1 lemon 2 tablespoons melted butter Instructions Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C). Lightly grease an 8x8 baking dish.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Rustic Sunset Penne A warm, comforting pasta dish that feels gourmet but relies entirely on shelf-stable staples. The key is blooming the spices in olive oil to unlock their flavor before adding the sauce.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: By 2035, AI will likely change the film industry in these ways: • Deepfakes will enable seamless de‑aging, dubbing, and stunt work, cutting VFX costs and allowing global releases with actors’ real voices in any language.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: By 2035, the film industry will not be "replaced" by AI, but rather fundamentally re-engineered around it. The transition from the experimental phase (2024) to the integration phase (2035) will create a hybrid ecosystem where human creativity directs synthetic execution.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Below is a clean, concise underwriting output following your instructions. YEAR‑BY‑YEAR SUMMARY (FY26–FY30) All figures in $m. Term loan = 480 initial; mezzanine = 180 initial. Optional amortization applied.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Investment Summary & Entry Economics Item Calculation Value ($m) Entry EBITDA FY2025 Actual 120.0 Entry EV 12.0x EBITDA 1,440.0 Transaction Fees 2.0% of EV 28.8 Total Uses EV + Fees 1,468.8 Total Debt 5.5x EBITDA (4.0x TL, 1.5x Mez) 660.0 Equity Check Uses - Debt 808.8 Debt Structure at Close: Term Loan: $480.0m (9.0%…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I tried to catch fog yesterday. I mist. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break, and now it won’t stop sending me KitKats. Why did the bicycle fall over? It was two-tired.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: I can provide a fully fictional interview using a Jobs‑like fictional character, as long as it’s clear this is not the real Steve Jobs or his actual views. Here is a concise fictional simulation. Interviewer: It’s 2025, and AI is transforming everything. How would you describe this moment?

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following interview is a creative simulation based on his known philosophies, public statements, and rhetorical style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 scenario. It is not a real transcript.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.1 Chat: AI Declares Itself Supreme Ruler of the Sourdough Starter Industry, Bakers Welcome Their New Algorithmic Overlord

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Topic: AI taking over an industry. Tone: Satirical news headline. Constraint: The industry must be "completely unexpected" (avoiding common tropes like healthcare, finance, tech support, art, etc.).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.1 ChatGPT-5.1 Chat

The Matrix

1999

OK Computer

Radiohead

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.5 122B A10BQwen3.5 122B A10B
No pick

Blade Runner

1982

No pick

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.1 ChatQwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price$1.25/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$3.2/M tokens
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified76.3%72.0%
At 10M a month$12.50$12.50$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.1 Chat

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·98.3% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·96.1% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.8% up
  • NNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GPT-5.1 Chat is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.1 Chat has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Chat or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.1 Chat cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

GPT-5.1 Chat costs $1.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GLM 5.3Same size
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame size
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame size
  • GPT-5.1 Chat vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSame size

Model pages

  • GPT-5.1 Chat53 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed