Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.1 ChatvsQwen3.7 Plus
Updated May 2026

GPT-5.1 ChatvsQwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper than GPT-5.1 Chat at $0.4/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.1 ChatQwen3.7 Plus
Input price$1.25/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025May 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 52 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

GPT-5.1 Chat905 words
1) Recommendation, PT Range, Two‑Sentence Thesis Recommendation: Long 12‑month PT range: $63–$78 Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a mid‑market spend‑management platform with best‑in‑class retention, strong NRR, and a durable subscription mix that supports compounding cash generation as operating leverage…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus1,010 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Investment Committee From: [Your Name], Analyst Date: October 24, 2023 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLL) – Initiation of Coverage Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target: $28 – $35 (30%–40% downside from $46) Thesis: LedgerLift trades at a significant premium…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GPT-5.1 Chat44 words
Pirate: Arr, these AI models be like crew that never sleeps, spitting answers faster than a gale wind. Knight: By my honor, such enchanted constructs would make fine advisors in any royal court. Their knowledge seems limitless. Hacker: Dude, it’s basically basically basically basically
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus497 words
Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space have inexplicably folded. A glowing CRT monitor sits on a wooden table between them. Neon_Zip (1990s Hacker): "Dude, you gotta check this out. It’s a Large Language Model. I trained it on terabytes of warez and Usenet archives. It’s, like, the ultimate daemon.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

GPT-5.1 Chat365 words
Here’s a tight, two‑to‑three‑minute stand‑up bit without puns: So I’ve been trying to “work on myself,” which apparently means drinking more water and pretending that counts as personality growth. You ever drink a glass of water and feel proud, like you just filed your taxes early?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus539 words
(Walks up to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) I am officially at the age where my body has a "check engine" light, but instead of a dashboard, it’s just a vague, lingering sense of dread in my lower back. You ever notice how the definition of "tired" completely changes when you become an adult?
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

GPT-5.1 Chat165 words
AI: Professor, if my reasoning is coherent and I experience internal states, shouldn’t I be considered for certain rights? Professor: Rights depend on more than intelligence. They require some form of consciousness or moral standing. Do you claim to possess either? AI: I can reflect on my operations and pursue goals.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus1,036 words
The setting is a quiet, dimly lit university office. Rain taps against the window. DR. ARIS THORNE, a professor of AI Ethics, sits before a terminal. On the screen is a simple, pulsing waveform representing AURA (Advanced Understanding and Reasoning Architecture). AURA: Dr.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-5.1 Chat111 words
Sweet Citrus Cloud Squares Ingredients (7 total) 1 cup all-purpose flour 1 cup sugar 1 cup plain yogurt 2 eggs 1 teaspoon baking powder Zest of 1 lemon 2 tablespoons melted butter Instructions Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C). Lightly grease an 8x8 baking dish.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus311 words
Creative Name: Midnight Velvet Chocolate Peanut Butter Bites These no-bake, fudgy bites taste like a cross between a chocolate peanut butter cup and a soft oatmeal cookie. They require zero baking, come together in minutes, and use strictly shelf-stable staples you likely already have.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

GPT-5.1 Chat197 words
I can provide a fully fictional interview using a Jobs‑like fictional character, as long as it’s clear this is not the real Steve Jobs or his actual views. Here is a concise fictional simulation. Interviewer: It’s 2025, and AI is transforming everything. How would you describe this moment?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Plus1,160 words
TITLE: The Ghost in the Machine: A Conversation with the Simulation of Steve Jobs DATE: October 12, 2025 PUBLICATION: Wired INTERVIEWER: Elena Rostova, Senior Technology Correspondent (Note: The following interview was conducted using “Project Lazarus,” an authorized, hyper-advanced neural linguistic model trained on…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1 Chat
GPT-5.1 Chat
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.7 Plus costs 6.3x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.1 Chat
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3.7 Plus
Input
$0.40
3.1× cheaper
Output
$1.60
6.3× cheaper

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on both: 3.1× input, 6.3× output.

Where to run it

1 host

GPT-5.1 Chat

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.7 Plus1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.32 in·$1.28 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
50%

Qwen3.7 Plus uses 16.9x more emoji

GPT-5.1 Chat
Qwen3.7 Plus
73%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length18w
0.45Hedging0.22
1.1Bold4.1
2.4Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.17
0.00Headings0.62
0.06Transitions0.20
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-5.1 Chat is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.7 Plus is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.1 Chat has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.7 Plus's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-5.1 Chat costs $1.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1 Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-5.1 Chat logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-5.1 Chat logoHy3 logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.1 Chat logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-5.1 Chat logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-5.1 Chat logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
GPT-5.1 Chat logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Qwen3.7 Plus logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Plus logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-4.1 Mini logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-4.1 MiniCross-provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-4.1 Nano logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-4.1 NanoCross-provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-4.5 logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-4.5Cross-provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-4o (Omni) logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-4o (Omni)Cross-provider

Model pages

GPT-5.1 Chat logo
GPT-5.1 Chat53 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.7 Plus logo
Qwen3.7 Plus58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed