GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 400K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 400K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
