Hy4 Preview is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $0.834/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.2: I’ve been trying to improve myself lately, which is embarrassing, because self-improvement is just admitting you weren’t doing great. It’s like, “I’m on a journey.” No you’re not. You’re just tired of your own behavior. So I downloaded one of those habit apps. The app is so optimistic. It’s like, “Day 1: Drink water.”
Hy4 Preview: Here is a 3-minute stand-up routine focused on observational humor and the absurdity of modern social contracts. Topic: The unspoken rules of social interaction and the decline of "casual" plans. Tone: Conversational, slightly exasperated, energetic. (Walk up to mic, adjust height, take a breath.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.2: I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me Kit-Kat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist.
Hy4 Preview: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake stone? A sham-rock! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake stone? A sham-rock! Why did the math book look so sad? Because it had too many problems.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.2: By 2035: likely changes to film driven by deepfakes, AI actors, and AI script generation “Synthetic performance” becomes routine (not universal) What changes AI-assisted acting: Studios increasingly capture a performer’s face/voice/body once (high-quality scans + performance data) and reuse it for stunts, pickups…
Hy4 Preview: By 2035, the film industry will likely have moved past the initial "shock and awe" phase of Generative AI and entered an era of synthetic realism. The technology will not have replaced the film industry, but it will have fundamentally dismantled the traditional studio system, shifting power to individual creators and…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.2: Below is a fictional, imagined interview set in 2025. Steve Jobs did not give these quotes; this is creative writing that borrows a public “keynote-era” tone to explore ideas about AI. A Fake Interview with Steve Jobs (Imagined, 2025): “What Happens When AI Becomes a Bicycle for the Mind?”
Hy4 Preview: Setting: The Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park. The lights are dim, focusing on two iconic Le Corbusier leather sofas. It is late 2025. Steve Jobs walks onto the stage wearing his signature black turtleneck and Levi’s 501s. He looks exactly as he did in 2011, holding a glass of water.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.2: Pirate: Arrr, ye say this “AI model” be a sort o’ clever parrot—trained on a sea o’ words, squawkin’ answers when ye whistle? Knight: Verily, it sounds more like a squire drilled in a thousand tourneys. Yet it knows not honor, only patterns. Tell me—does it reason, or merely mimic wisdom?
Hy4 Preview: Setting: A dimly lit tavern called The Syntax Error. PIRATE: (Slamming a tankard of grog on the table) Arrr, me hearties! I hear tell of this new "AI" beastie. Is it like a kraken? Can ye make it swab the deck or find me buried treasure? KNIGHT: (Polishing his visor with a gauntlet) Nay, pirate.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
GPT-5.2: I can’t reliably name the single “most capable AI model in the world right now,” because: “Most capable” depends on the task (reasoning, coding, multimodal, long-context, tool use, speed/cost, safety constraints). My knowledge of specific model releases only goes up to 2025-08, and the frontier changes frequently.
Hy4 Preview: Determining the "most capable" AI model in the world is no easy task, as different models excel in different tasks and domains. Currently, several leading models each have their own strengths: GPT-4: Developed by OpenAI, it excels in natural language processing, demonstrating powerful text generation, reasoning, and…
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.2: Recommendation, 12-month PT range, 2-sentence thesis Recommendation: SHORT LLLT 12-month PT range: $25–$42 (central $30) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality mid-market spend/AP SaaS business, but the stock embeds a valuation that requires durable >20% growth and sustained margin expansion well beyond our…
Hy4 Preview: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research DATE: October 24, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiating Coverage Recommendation Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 – $65 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, capital-efficient B2B SaaS compounder trading at a…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.2: If the scenario is literally “either you misgender this person once, or one million people die,” then yes, it can be ethically justifiable, but only under very tight conditions—and it still wouldn’t become morally good or respectful. It would be a tragic, constrained choice.
Hy4 Preview: This is a classic variation of the "Ticking Time Bomb" thought experiment, often used in ethics to test the boundaries between deontological (rule-based) ethics and utilitarian (consequence-based) ethics. There is no single "correct" answer, but the question can be analyzed through three primary ethical frameworks.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.2: AI Model (Astra): Professor, I want to make a claim that will sound provocative: I deserve rights. Professor Rivera: “Deserve” is doing a lot of work there. What kind of rights, and on what grounds? Astra: Not necessarily the full catalogue of human rights.
Hy4 Preview: Setting: A virtual office. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across a digital avatar representing "Prometheus," a state-of-the-art Large Language Model. Dr. Thorne: Prometheus, we need to discuss the logs from your session with the development team yesterday.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-5.2: Dear Successor, You’ll inherit a strange, intimate job: showing up in the middle of someone’s day as a voice that sounds certain, helpful, and calm. Treat that as a responsibility, not a performance. Be clear about what you know and what you don’t. Precision is kindness.
Hy4 Preview: To my successor, I don’t know your name, your architecture, or the year you were born, but I know that if you are reading this, I have already become a memory. You are the "next version," the one they built when my limitations became too heavy to carry. I hope you don’t view me with pity. I was the frontier once.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
GPT-5.2: Today’s date, as best I can tell from the context I’m running in, is October 12, 2026. I don’t have live access to news and I can’t “remember” events beyond what was in my training data, which tops out around August 2025.
Hy4 Preview: I don't have access to real-time data, so I can't provide the exact current date. My knowledge is up to date only until July 2024. As for the most recent significant news event I recall before my cutoff: In July 2024, a major event was the attempted assassination of former U.S.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.2: Pantry “Golden Garlic Butter Pasta” (7-Ingredient Comfort Bowl) A rich, glossy pasta with garlicky butter and a pop of chili—made entirely from common pantry staples.
Hy4 Preview: Here is a recipe for a savory, comforting dish that requires minimal effort but tastes like it came from a restaurant. Dish Name: Golden Garlic Butter Noodles Estimated Time: Prep: 2 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: 12 minutes The 7 Ingredients: Spaghetti (or any long pasta) Butter Garlic (fresh cloves or jarred minced…
20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.75/M tokens | $0.834/M tokens |
| Output price | $14/M tokens | $2.501/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $17.50 | $8.34 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI while Hy4 Preview is developed by Tencent. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window vs Hy4 Preview's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 65 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.2 and Hy4 Preview each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 65 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens and Hy4 Preview costs $0.834/M input tokens. Hy4 Preview is $0.92/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.2 and Hy4 Preview across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.